knutole commented on issue #2111: URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2111#issuecomment-2642776446
> [@knutole](https://github.com/knutole), [@jrgemignani](https://github.com/jrgemignani)'s statement was clear. The team paid to work on AGE was let go — most likely because funding ran out or shifted to other priorities. Whatever the reason, he summarized the future direction below: > > > Currently, there isn't an eta for, nor a roadmap to, an Apache AGE version for PG17 **or any continuing support**. > > Paid work for an open source can accelerate a project until the money, passion, or time runs out. It sucks, as AGE is one of the more exciting projects for PostgreSQL. I don't accept that an open source Apache project, which many people use and contribute to, can just "shut down" without proper explanation and future planning. It seems that the main contributor @jrgemignani was made redundant at BitNine, and [Apache Committee](https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?age) which "owns" the repo (and thus the write access) has not passed the torch to someone else. More info here: https://github.com/bitnine-oss/agensgraph/issues/663#issuecomment-2642724649 Seems that the Apache AGE Committee should be called upon to pass the torch on this project. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@age.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
