dev  

Messages by Thread

• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Providers prepared on 2026-05-05 are released Beck, Vincent
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release preparation date 2026-05-05 Vincent Beck
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release preparation date 2026-05-05 Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release preparation date 2026-05-05 Jarek Potiuk
• [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Omkar P
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Dev-iL
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Jens Scheffler
• [DISCUSS] New AIP-XX: AIP-85-1: DAG importer Igor Kholopov via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New AIP-XX: AIP-85-1: DAG importer Jens Scheffler
• PyCon Busan 2026(Korea) - Apache Airflow Session & Community Booth Yeonguk Choo
  • Re: PyCon Busan 2026(Korea) - Apache Airflow Session & Community Booth Amogh Desai
• Introducing the TypeScript Task SDK (initial PR - 66289) Shivam Rastogi
  • Re: Introducing the TypeScript Task SDK (initial PR - 66289) Jens Scheffler
  • Re: Introducing the TypeScript Task SDK (initial PR - 66289) Rahul Vats
  • Re: Introducing the TypeScript Task SDK (initial PR - 66289) Shivam Rastogi
  • Re: Introducing the TypeScript Task SDK (initial PR - 66289) Zhe-You(Jason) Liu
• [REMINDER]: Airflow Dev call on 7th May - agenda Vikram Koka via dev
• [LAZY CONSENSUS] Helm Chart Refurbish: Kustomize overlays structure Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Helm Chart Refurbish: Kustomize overlays structure Buğra Öztürk
• [LAZY CONSENSUS] airflowctl parameter style: positional vs named arguments Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] airflowctl parameter style: positional vs named arguments Buğra Öztürk
• [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-05 Beck, Vincent
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-05 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-05 Wei Lee
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-05 Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-05 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-05 Rahul Vats
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-05 Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-05 Shahar Epstein
• [DISCUSS] Maintainer PR dashboard prototype + next-round triage update Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Maintainer PR dashboard prototype + next-round triage update Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Maintainer PR dashboard prototype + next-round triage update Aaron Chen
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow CTL 0.1.4 from 0.1.4rc3 released Jarek Potiuk
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Ctl - release 0.1.4 from 0.1.4rc3 Jarek Potiuk
• [LAZY CONSENSUS] Simplifying the new community provider acceptance process Elad Kalif
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Simplifying the new community provider acceptance process Elad Kalif
• Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Jens Scheffler
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Aritra Basu
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Amogh Desai
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Rich Bowen
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Pratiksha Badheka
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Rich Bowen
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Jarek Potiuk
• [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub gui
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub Piyush Mudgal
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub gui
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub Vincent Beck
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub gui
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub Wei Lee
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub John Williams
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Providers prepared on 2026-04-26 are released Shahar Epstein
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release preparation date 2026-04-26 Shahar Epstein
• [RESULT] April 2026 PR of the Month Briana Steel via dev
• [ANNOUNCE] May 2026 Airflow Monthly Town Hall Recording Briana Steel via dev
• [DISCUSS] Allow manual/operator-triggered DAG runs with future logical_date Mingjie Zhao
• [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() 김준영
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() 김준영
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() 김준영
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() 김준영
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() 김준영
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() 김준영
• [RESULT] [VOTE] April 2026 Rookie PR of the Month Srabasti Banerjee
• Korea Apache Airflow 6th Meetup - June 20, Seoul (Karrot) Yeonguk Choo
  • Re: Korea Apache Airflow 6th Meetup - June 20, Seoul (Karrot) Jarek Potiuk
• [ANNOUNCE] Improving security handling and triaging processes as ASF Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Improving security handling and triaging processes as ASF Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Improving security handling and triaging processes as ASF Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Improving security handling and triaging processes as ASF Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Improving security handling and triaging processes as ASF Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Improving security handling and triaging processes as ASF Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Improving security handling and triaging processes as ASF Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Improving security handling and triaging processes as ASF Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Improving security handling and triaging processes as ASF Jarek Potiuk
• [PR] ci: add prek/zizmor/codeql/allowlist workflows, dependabot, .asf.yaml [airflow-steward] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add prek/zizmor/codeql/allowlist workflows, dependabot, .asf.yaml [airflow-steward] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add prek/zizmor/codeql/allowlist workflows, dependabot, .asf.yaml [airflow-steward] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add prek/zizmor/codeql/allowlist workflows, dependabot, .asf.yaml [airflow-steward] Jarek Potiuk
• [PR] tools(oauth-draft): port Gmail OAuth helpers into framework [airflow-steward] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tools(oauth-draft): port Gmail OAuth helpers into framework [airflow-steward] via GitHub
• [ANNOUNCE] uv 0.11.8 upgrade needd for tip of active branches Jarek Potiuk
• [PR] docs: add <framework> placeholder; update Python invocations to use it [airflow-steward] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add <framework> placeholder; update Python invocations to use it [airflow-steward] via GitHub
• [PR] tools(generate-cve-json): port project-agnostic Python implementation into framework [airflow-steward] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tools(generate-cve-json): port project-agnostic Python implementation into framework [airflow-steward] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: tighten Airflow references to placeholders across framework files [airflow-steward] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: tighten Airflow references to placeholders across framework files [airflow-steward] via GitHub
• [VOTE] April 2026 PR of the Month Briana Steel via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] April 2026 PR of the Month Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] April 2026 PR of the Month Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] April 2026 PR of the Month Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] April 2026 PR of the Month Jed Cunningham
  • Re: [VOTE] April 2026 PR of the Month Wei Lee
  • Re: [VOTE] April 2026 PR of the Month Rahul Vats
  • Re: [VOTE] April 2026 PR of the Month Pierre Jeambrun
  • Re: [VOTE] April 2026 PR of the Month Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [VOTE] April 2026 PR of the Month Yeonguk Choo
  • Re: [VOTE] April 2026 PR of the Month Amogh Desai
• [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-04-26 Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-04-26 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-04-26 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-04-26 Wei Lee
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-04-26 Rahul Vats
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-04-26 Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-04-26 Shahar Epstein
• 💌 Airflow Summit 2026 - Confirmed sessions 👀 Teyza Ponce
• [DISCUSS] Triage + review AI assistance - human- or not human- assisted triage / review ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Triage + review AI assistance - human- or not human- assisted triage / review ? Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Triage + review AI assistance - human- or not human- assisted triage / review ? Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Triage + review AI assistance - human- or not human- assisted triage / review ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Triage + review AI assistance - human- or not human- assisted triage / review ? Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Triage + review AI assistance - human- or not human- assisted triage / review ? Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Triage + review AI assistance - human- or not human- assisted triage / review ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Triage + review AI assistance - human- or not human- assisted triage / review ? Pierre Jeambrun
• [DISCUSS] Simplifying the new community provider acceptance process Elad Kalif
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying the new community provider acceptance process Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying the new community provider acceptance process Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying the new community provider acceptance process Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying the new community provider acceptance process Elad Kalif
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying the new community provider acceptance process Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying the new community provider acceptance process Elad Kalif
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying the new community provider acceptance process Jarek Potiuk
• [DISCUSS] LAZY CONSENSUS/DISCUSS - when / what reminder/ recall Jarek Potiuk
• [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Zhe-You(Jason) Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Zhe-You(Jason) Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Aritra Basu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Stefan Wang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Zhe-You(Jason) Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Philippe Gagnon via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Stefan Wang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer [was: LAZY CONSENSUS] Jens Scheffler
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Python Client 3.2.1 Released Rahul Vats
• [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 3.2.1 from 3.2.1rc1 Rahul Vats
• [LAZY CONSENSUS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Aritra Basu
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Zhe-You(Jason) Liu
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Java SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Tzu-ping Chung via dev
• [DISCUSS] airflowctl parameter style: positional vs named arguments Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] airflowctl parameter style: positional vs named arguments Shivam Rastogi
  • Re: [DISCUSS] airflowctl parameter style: positional vs named arguments Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] airflowctl parameter style: positional vs named arguments Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] airflowctl parameter style: positional vs named arguments Buğra Öztürk
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Providers prepared on 2026-04-21 are released Shahar Epstein
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release preparation date 2026-04-21 Shahar Epstein
• [DISCUSS] Clarifying the role of CODEOWNERS and its relationship to provider stewardship Dev-iL
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying the role of CODEOWNERS and its relationship to provider stewardship Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying the role of CODEOWNERS and its relationship to provider stewardship Dev-iL
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying the role of CODEOWNERS and its relationship to provider stewardship Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying the role of CODEOWNERS and its relationship to provider stewardship Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying the role of CODEOWNERS and its relationship to provider stewardship Amogh Desai
• [VOTE] April 2026 Rookie PR of the Month Srabasti Banerjee
  • Re: [VOTE] April 2026 Rookie PR of the Month Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] April 2026 Rookie PR of the Month Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] April 2026 Rookie PR of the Month Srabasti Banerjee
• [DISCUSS] Helm Chart Refurbish: Kustomize Direction and Path to 2.0 Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Helm Chart Refurbish: Kustomize Direction and Path to 2.0 Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Helm Chart Refurbish: Kustomize Direction and Path to 2.0 Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Helm Chart Refurbish: Kustomize Direction and Path to 2.0 Zhe-You(Jason) Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Helm Chart Refurbish: Kustomize Direction and Path to 2.0 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Helm Chart Refurbish: Kustomize Direction and Path to 2.0 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Helm Chart Refurbish: Kustomize Direction and Path to 2.0 Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Helm Chart Refurbish: Kustomize Direction and Path to 2.0 Przemysław Mirowski
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Helm Chart Refurbish: Kustomize Direction and Path to 2.0 Buğra Öztürk
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.21.0 Released Buğra Öztürk
• [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.21.0 based on 1.21.0rc2 Buğra Öztürk
• [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 3.2.1 from 3.2.1rc1 Rahul Vats

• Earlier messages