dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Implement auto-triage and "Drafting" process for PRs of non-collaborators Kevin Yang
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Implement auto-triage and "Drafting" process for PRs of non-collaborators Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Implement auto-triage and "Drafting" process for PRs of non-collaborators Kevin Yang
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Implement auto-triage and "Drafting" process for PRs of non-collaborators Vincent Beck
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Implement auto-triage and "Drafting" process for PRs of non-collaborators Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Implement auto-triage and "Drafting" process for PRs of non-collaborators EJ Stinson
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Implement auto-triage and "Drafting" process for PRs of non-collaborators Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Implement auto-triage and "Drafting" process for PRs of non-collaborators EJ Stinson
• [DISCUSS] Providers support for Airflow 2.11 Elad Kalif
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Providers support for Airflow 2.11 Michał Modras via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Providers support for Airflow 2.11 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Providers support for Airflow 2.11 Elad Kalif
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Providers support for Airflow 2.11 Michał Modras via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Providers support for Airflow 2.11 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Providers support for Airflow 2.11 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Providers support for Airflow 2.11 Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Providers support for Airflow 2.11 Elad Kalif
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Providers support for Airflow 2.11 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Providers support for Airflow 2.11 Michał Modras via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Providers support for Airflow 2.11 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Providers support for Airflow 2.11 Jarek Potiuk
• GSoC26: Interest in Breeze Contribution Agent Skills - Hardik Agarwal Hardik Agarwal
  • Re: GSoC26: Interest in Breeze Contribution Agent Skills - Hardik Agarwal Zhe-You(Jason) Liu
  • Re: GSoC26: Interest in Breeze Contribution Agent Skills - Hardik Agarwal Hardik Agarwal
  • Re: GSoC26: Interest in Breeze Contribution Agent Skills - Hardik Agarwal Jarek Potiuk
• [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Rahul Vats
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh André Ahlert
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Ephraim Anierobi
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Elad Kalif
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Tamara Fingerlin via dev
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Aritra Basu
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Pankaj Koti via dev
  • RE: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Blain David
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Zhe-You(Jason) Liu
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Yeonguk Choo
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Shubham Raj
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Dheeraj Turaga
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Wei Lee
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Phani Kumar via dev
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Ankit Chaurasia
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Srabasti Banerjee
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Bowrna Prabhakaran
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Oliveira, Niko
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Amogh Desai
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Kunal Bhattacharya
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ASF members from our community - Jens and Amogh Ferruzzi, Dennis
• [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.8 from 3.1.8rc1 & Task SDK 1.1.8 from 1.1.8rc1 Rahul Vats
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.8 from 3.1.8rc1 & Task SDK 1.1.8 from 1.1.8rc1 Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.8 from 3.1.8rc1 & Task SDK 1.1.8 from 1.1.8rc1 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.8 from 3.1.8rc1 & Task SDK 1.1.8 from 1.1.8rc1 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.8 from 3.1.8rc1 & Task SDK 1.1.8 from 1.1.8rc1 Ephraim Anierobi
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.8 from 3.1.8rc1 & Task SDK 1.1.8 from 1.1.8rc1 Wei Lee
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.8 from 3.1.8rc1 & Task SDK 1.1.8 from 1.1.8rc1 Rahul Vats
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.8 from 3.1.8rc1 & Task SDK 1.1.8 from 1.1.8rc1 Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.8 from 3.1.8rc1 & Task SDK 1.1.8 from 1.1.8rc1 Amogh Desai
• Call for Mentees – Open Source Contribution Academy(Korea) Yeonguk Choo
  • Re: Call for Mentees – Open Source Contribution Academy(Korea) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Call for Mentees – Open Source Contribution Academy(Korea) Yeonguk Choo
• [DISCUSS] Interest in adding a Stripe provider to Airflow André Ahlert
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Interest in adding a Stripe provider to Airflow Zhe-You(Jason) Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Interest in adding a Stripe provider to Airflow Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Interest in adding a Stripe provider to Airflow Amogh Desai
• New: Native AI/LLM integration + DataFusion analytics for Apache Airflow 3 (AIP-99) Kaxil Naik
  • Re: New: Native AI/LLM integration + DataFusion analytics for Apache Airflow 3 (AIP-99) Amogh Desai
  • Re: New: Native AI/LLM integration + DataFusion analytics for Apache Airflow 3 (AIP-99) Jens Scheffler
  • Re: New: Native AI/LLM integration + DataFusion analytics for Apache Airflow 3 (AIP-99) Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: New: Native AI/LLM integration + DataFusion analytics for Apache Airflow 3 (AIP-99) Kaxil Naik
  • Re: New: Native AI/LLM integration + DataFusion analytics for Apache Airflow 3 (AIP-99) Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: New: Native AI/LLM integration + DataFusion analytics for Apache Airflow 3 (AIP-99) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: New: Native AI/LLM integration + DataFusion analytics for Apache Airflow 3 (AIP-99) Vikram Koka via dev
• [Discuss] How we submit Airflow-Specific Rules to Ruff Wei Lee
  • Re: [Discuss] How we submit Airflow-Specific Rules to Ruff Dev-iL
  • Re: [Discuss] How we submit Airflow-Specific Rules to Ruff Wei Lee
  • Re: [Discuss] How we submit Airflow-Specific Rules to Ruff Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [Discuss] How we submit Airflow-Specific Rules to Ruff Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [Discuss] How we submit Airflow-Specific Rules to Ruff André Ahlert
  • Re: [Discuss] How we submit Airflow-Specific Rules to Ruff Przemysław Mirowski
  • Re: [Discuss] How we submit Airflow-Specific Rules to Ruff Wei Lee
  • Re: [Discuss] How we submit Airflow-Specific Rules to Ruff Jarek Potiuk
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Providers prepared on 2026-03-03 are released Jarek Potiuk
• [RESULT][ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers - release preparation date 2026-03-03 Jarek Potiuk
• [DISCUSS] [CALL FOR HELP] Executor Callback support for remaining executors + future callback migration Ferruzzi, Dennis
  • Re: [DISCUSS] [CALL FOR HELP] Executor Callback support for remaining executors + future callback migration Shivam Rastogi
  • Re: [DISCUSS] [CALL FOR HELP] Executor Callback support for remaining executors + future callback migration Sebastian Daum
  • Re: [DISCUSS] [CALL FOR HELP] Executor Callback support for remaining executors + future callback migration Kevin Yang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] [CALL FOR HELP] Executor Callback support for remaining executors + future callback migration Ferruzzi, Dennis
  • RE: [DISCUSS] [CALL FOR HELP] Executor Callback support for remaining executors + future callback migration Jeongwoo Do
  • RE: Re: [DISCUSS] [CALL FOR HELP] Executor Callback support for remaining executors + future callback migration Sameer Mesiah
  • RE: Re: [DISCUSS] [CALL FOR HELP] Executor Callback support for remaining executors + future callback migration Sameer Mesiah
• 📢 Apache Airflow 3.2.0beta1 is available for testing! 🎉 Rahul Vats
  • Re: 📢 Apache Airflow 3.2.0beta1 is available for testing! 🎉 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: 📢 Apache Airflow 3.2.0beta1 is available for testing! 🎉 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: 📢 Apache Airflow 3.2.0beta1 is available for testing! 🎉 Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: 📢 Apache Airflow 3.2.0beta1 is available for testing! 🎉 Dheeraj Turaga
  • Re: 📢 Apache Airflow 3.2.0beta1 is available for testing! 🎉 Yeonguk Choo
  • Re: 📢 Apache Airflow 3.2.0beta1 is available for testing! 🎉 Amogh Desai
• [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-03-03 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-03-03 Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-03-03 Vincent Beck
  • Re: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-03-03 Dheeraj Turaga
• [PROPOSAL] ADBC Provider for Apache Airflow Blain David
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] ADBC Provider for Apache Airflow Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • RE: [PROPOSAL] ADBC Provider for Apache Airflow Blain David
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] ADBC Provider for Apache Airflow Zhe-You(Jason) Liu
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] ADBC Provider for Apache Airflow Jarek Potiuk
• [DISCUSS] Make our "ready for review" expectation more explicit and stricter Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Make our "ready for review" expectation more explicit and stricter Wei Lee
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Make our "ready for review" expectation more explicit and stricter Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Make our "ready for review" expectation more explicit and stricter Vincent Beck
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Make our "ready for review" expectation more explicit and stricter Zhe-You Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Make our "ready for review" expectation more explicit and stricter Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Make our "ready for review" expectation more explicit and stricter Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Make our "ready for review" expectation more explicit and stricter Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Make our "ready for review" expectation more explicit and stricter Jarek Potiuk
• [DISCUSS] Interest in adding an IBM MQ provider (Hook + MessageQueueProvider) to Airflow Blain David
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Interest in adding an IBM MQ provider (Hook + MessageQueueProvider) to Airflow Zhe-You(Jason) Liu
  • RE: [DISCUSS] Interest in adding an IBM MQ provider (Hook + MessageQueueProvider) to Airflow Blain David
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Interest in adding an IBM MQ provider (Hook + MessageQueueProvider) to Airflow Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Interest in adding an IBM MQ provider (Hook + MessageQueueProvider) to Airflow Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Interest in adding an IBM MQ provider (Hook + MessageQueueProvider) to Airflow Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Interest in adding an IBM MQ provider (Hook + MessageQueueProvider) to Airflow Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Interest in adding an IBM MQ provider (Hook + MessageQueueProvider) to Airflow Elad Kalif
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Interest in adding an IBM MQ provider (Hook + MessageQueueProvider) to Airflow Jarek Potiuk
  • RE: [DISCUSS] Interest in adding an IBM MQ provider (Hook + MessageQueueProvider) to Airflow Blain David
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Interest in adding an IBM MQ provider (Hook + MessageQueueProvider) to Airflow Kaxil Naik
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Providers prepared on 2026-02-26 are released Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Providers prepared on 2026-02-26 are released Zhe-You(Jason) Liu
• [DISCUSS] Airflow Ctl (airflowctl) backward compatibility and moving integration tests to main Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow Ctl (airflowctl) backward compatibility and moving integration tests to main Dheeraj Turaga
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow Ctl (airflowctl) backward compatibility and moving integration tests to main Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow Ctl (airflowctl) backward compatibility and moving integration tests to main Buğra Öztürk
• [RESULT] [VOTE] February 2026 PR of the Month Briana Steel via dev
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release preparation date 2026-02-26 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release preparation date 2026-02-26 Jarek Potiuk
• [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Shubham Raj
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Rahul Vats
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Pankaj Koti via dev
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Wei Lee
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Josef Šimánek
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Vincent Beck
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Bishundeo, Rajeshwar
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Ankit Chaurasia
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Kunal Bhattacharya
  • RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Blain David
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Zhe-You Liu
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu kalyan reddy
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Pratiksha Badheka
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Dheeraj Turaga
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Yeonguk Choo
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Bowrna Prabhakaran
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Karthikeyan
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Srabasti Banerjee
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pavan kumar Gopidesu Amogh Desai
• [CFP] Apache Community Over Code - Airflow Days - reminder to submit your contributor talks Jarek Potiuk
• [CFP] Airflow Summit - reminder to submit your talks soon! Jarek Potiuk
• GSoC 2026 – Guidance Request for Airflow Project Preparation Chinni Yadav
  • Re: GSoC 2026 – Guidance Request for Airflow Project Preparation Zhe-You Liu
• [ANNOUNCE] Airflow 2.11.1 - Python 3.12 constraints and image updated today Jarek Potiuk
• Fwd: Applications for Travel Assistance to Community Over Code Glasgow now open Jarek Potiuk
• [AIP-86] Deadline Callback queuing and priority Ferruzzi, Dennis
  • Re: [AIP-86] Deadline Callback queuing and priority Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [AIP-86] Deadline Callback queuing and priority Ferruzzi, Dennis
  • Re: [AIP-86] Deadline Callback queuing and priority Amogh Desai
  • Re: [AIP-86] Deadline Callback queuing and priority Ferruzzi, Dennis
  • Re: [AIP-86] Deadline Callback queuing and priority Amogh Desai
• [DISCUSS] Active approach to fighting with AI slop (while keeping maintainers in the driving seat) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Active approach to fighting with AI slop (while keeping maintainers in the driving seat) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Active approach to fighting with AI slop (while keeping maintainers in the driving seat) Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Active approach to fighting with AI slop (while keeping maintainers in the driving seat) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Active approach to fighting with AI slop (while keeping maintainers in the driving seat) Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Active approach to fighting with AI slop (while keeping maintainers in the driving seat) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Active approach to fighting with AI slop (while keeping maintainers in the driving seat) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Active approach to fighting with AI slop (while keeping maintainers in the driving seat) Nathan Hadfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Active approach to fighting with AI slop (while keeping maintainers in the driving seat) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Active approach to fighting with AI slop (while keeping maintainers in the driving seat) Aritra Basu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Active approach to fighting with AI slop (while keeping maintainers in the driving seat) Jarek Potiuk
  • RE: [DISCUSS] Active approach to fighting with AI slop (while keeping maintainers in the driving seat) Damian Shaw
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Active approach to fighting with AI slop (while keeping maintainers in the driving seat) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Active approach to fighting with AI slop (while keeping maintainers in the driving seat) Jarek Potiuk
  • RE: [DISCUSS] Active approach to fighting with AI slop (while keeping maintainers in the driving seat) Damian Shaw
• [RESULT] [VOTE] February 2026 Rookie PR of the Month Srabasti Banerjee
• [LAZY CONSENSUS] Suspend Apache Beam provider due to grpcio limitation Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Suspend Apache Beam provider due to grpcio limitation Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Suspend Apache Beam provider due to grpcio limitation Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Suspend Apache Beam provider due to grpcio limitation Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Suspend Apache Beam provider due to grpcio limitation Pierre Jeambrun

• Earlier messages
• Later messages