dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [DISCUSS] Dropping Python 3.10 support Aaron Chen
• [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-10-02 (ad-hoc) Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-10-02 (ad-hoc) Blain David
  • Re: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-10-02 (ad-hoc) Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-10-02 (ad-hoc) Aaron Chen
  • Re: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-10-02 (ad-hoc) Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-10-02 (ad-hoc) Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-10-02 (ad-hoc) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-10-02 (ad-hoc) Vincent Beck
  • Re: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-10-02 (ad-hoc) Shahar Epstein
• [DISCUSS] Native YAML Dag format via AIP-85 importer interface Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Native YAML Dag format via AIP-85 importer interface Tim Paine
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Native YAML Dag format via AIP-85 importer interface Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Native YAML Dag format via AIP-85 importer interface Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Native YAML Dag format via AIP-85 importer interface Pierre Jeambrun
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Native YAML Dag format via AIP-85 importer interface Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Native YAML Dag format via AIP-85 importer interface Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Native YAML Dag format via AIP-85 importer interface Pierre Jeambrun
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Native YAML Dag format via AIP-85 importer interface Vikram Koka via dev
• [RESULT] [VOTE] September 2026 Rookie PR of the Month Srabasti Banerjee
• Re: [DISCUSS] Infrastructure-Aware Task Execution and Resumable Operators - Proposals for Reliability Stefan Wang
• [RESULT][VOTE] September 2026 PR of the Month Kenten Danas via dev
• [RESULT][VOTE] Naming of the `.batch(size=)` method in AIP-104 (Iterable Tasks) Blain David
• [VOTE] AIP-104 Iterable Tasks (IT) and Task Spreading (TS) Blain David
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-104 Iterable Tasks (IT) and Task Spreading (TS) Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-104 Iterable Tasks (IT) and Task Spreading (TS) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-104 Iterable Tasks (IT) and Task Spreading (TS) Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-104 Iterable Tasks (IT) and Task Spreading (TS) Jens Scheffler via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-104 Iterable Tasks (IT) and Task Spreading (TS) Zach Gottesman via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-104 Iterable Tasks (IT) and Task Spreading (TS) Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-104 Iterable Tasks (IT) and Task Spreading (TS) Dheeraj Turaga
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-104 Iterable Tasks (IT) and Task Spreading (TS) Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-104 Iterable Tasks (IT) and Task Spreading (TS) Wei Lee
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-104 Iterable Tasks (IT) and Task Spreading (TS) Ash Berlin-Taylor
• MLH Fellowship on Airflow, Fall 2026 Daman Arora via dev
  • Re: MLH Fellowship on Airflow, Fall 2026 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: MLH Fellowship on Airflow, Fall 2026 Amogh Desai
• Preparing for Airflow 3.4.0 Release Rahul Vats
  • Re: Preparing for Airflow 3.4.0 Release Amogh Desai
  • Re: Preparing for Airflow 3.4.0 Release Shahar Epstein
  • Re: Preparing for Airflow 3.4.0 Release Jarek Potiuk
• [RESULT][LAZY CONSENSUS] Deprecate cyclic TaskGroup dependencies in 3.4, reject them in 3.5 Dheeraj Turaga
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Providers prepared on 2026-09-22 are released Shahar Epstein
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release preparation date 2026-09-22 Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release preparation date 2026-09-22 Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release preparation date 2026-09-22 Shahar Epstein
• [VOTE] September 2026 PR of the Month Kenten Danas via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] September 2026 PR of the Month Jyun-An Chen
  • Re: [VOTE] September 2026 PR of the Month Aaron Chen
  • Re: [VOTE] September 2026 PR of the Month 蕭昌沅
  • Re: [VOTE] September 2026 PR of the Month hello.wei-lee.me via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] September 2026 PR of the Month Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] September 2026 PR of the Month Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [VOTE] September 2026 PR of the Month Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] September 2026 PR of the Month Blain David
  • Re: [VOTE] September 2026 PR of the Month Kaxil Naik
• [DISCUSS] AIP-97: Task Failure Classification Stefan Wang
• [DISCUSS] Task Loops and Dynamic Task Groups should not break existing TaskGroup usage patterns Dheeraj Turaga
• [VOTE] September 2026 Rookie PR of the Month Srabasti Banerjee
  • Re: [VOTE] September 2026 Rookie PR of the Month Aaron Chen
  • Re: [VOTE] September 2026 Rookie PR of the Month Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] September 2026 Rookie PR of the Month Srabasti Banerjee
• [ANNOUNCE] Open pull request limit is temporarily a soft limit Jarek Potiuk
• [LAZY CONSENSUS] Deprecate cyclic TaskGroup dependencies in 3.4, reject them in 3.5 Dheeraj Turaga
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Deprecate cyclic TaskGroup dependencies in 3.4, reject them in 3.5 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Deprecate cyclic TaskGroup dependencies in 3.4, reject them in 3.5 Dheeraj Turaga
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Deprecate cyclic TaskGroup dependencies in 3.4, reject them in 3.5 Blain David
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Deprecate cyclic TaskGroup dependencies in 3.4, reject them in 3.5 Jarek Potiuk
  • RE: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Deprecate cyclic TaskGroup dependencies in 3.4, reject them in 3.5 Damian Shaw
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Deprecate cyclic TaskGroup dependencies in 3.4, reject them in 3.5 Dheeraj Turaga
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Deprecate cyclic TaskGroup dependencies in 3.4, reject them in 3.5 Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Deprecate cyclic TaskGroup dependencies in 3.4, reject them in 3.5 Ash Berlin-Taylor
• [DISCUSS] Warn at Dag parse time when sensor has no explicit timeout defined Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Warn at Dag parse time when sensor has no explicit timeout defined Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Warn at Dag parse time when sensor has no explicit timeout defined Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Warn at Dag parse time when sensor has no explicit timeout defined constance.astronomer.io via dev
• [Meeting Notes] Airflow dev call - 24 September 2026 Vikram Koka via dev
• [RESULT][LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [RESULT][LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [RESULT][LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Yuseok Jo
  • Re: [RESULT][LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Andrew Chang
  • Re: [RESULT][LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [RESULT][LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Yuseok Jo
  • Re: [RESULT][LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Andrew Chang
• [DISCUSS] Handling cyclic TaskGroup dependencies (Grid/Graph 500 since 3.3.1) Dheeraj Turaga
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Handling cyclic TaskGroup dependencies (Grid/Graph 500 since 3.3.1) Blain David
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Handling cyclic TaskGroup dependencies (Grid/Graph 500 since 3.3.1) Jarek Potiuk
  • RE: [DISCUSS] Handling cyclic TaskGroup dependencies (Grid/Graph 500 since 3.3.1) Damian Shaw
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Handling cyclic TaskGroup dependencies (Grid/Graph 500 since 3.3.1) Pierre Jeambrun
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Handling cyclic TaskGroup dependencies (Grid/Graph 500 since 3.3.1) Dheeraj Turaga
• [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-09-22 Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-09-22 Aaron Chen
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-09-22 Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-09-22 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-09-22 Pankaj Koti via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-09-22 Wei Lee
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-09-22 Sameer Mesiah
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-09-22 PoAn Yang
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-09-22 Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-09-22 Wei Lee
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-09-22 Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-09-22 Wei Lee
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-09-22 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-09-22 Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-09-22 Shahar Epstein
  • RE: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-09-22 Subhramit B.B.
• CONFLUENCE 2026 x Apache Airflow — Open-Source & Linux Bootcamp Collaboration ieee.vips.edu via dev
• [DISCUSS] Human Summary section in agent-drafted PR descriptions Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Human Summary section in agent-drafted PR descriptions Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Human Summary section in agent-drafted PR descriptions Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Human Summary section in agent-drafted PR descriptions Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Human Summary section in agent-drafted PR descriptions Justin Pakzad
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Human Summary section in agent-drafted PR descriptions Jarek Potiuk
• [LAZY CONSENSUS] Human Summary section in agent-drafted PR descriptions Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Human Summary section in agent-drafted PR descriptions Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Human Summary section in agent-drafted PR descriptions Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Human Summary section in agent-drafted PR descriptions Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Human Summary section in agent-drafted PR descriptions Jarek Potiuk
• [VOTE] Naming of the `.batch(size=)` method in AIP-104 (Iterable Tasks) Blain David
  • Re: [VOTE] Naming of the `.batch(size=)` method in AIP-104 (Iterable Tasks) Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [VOTE] Naming of the `.batch(size=)` method in AIP-104 (Iterable Tasks) Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [VOTE] Naming of the `.batch(size=)` method in AIP-104 (Iterable Tasks) Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [VOTE] Naming of the `.batch(size=)` method in AIP-104 (Iterable Tasks) Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [VOTE] Naming of the `.batch(size=)` method in AIP-104 (Iterable Tasks) constance.astronomer.io via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Naming of the `.batch(size=)` method in AIP-104 (Iterable Tasks) Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] Naming of the `.batch(size=)` method in AIP-104 (Iterable Tasks) David Blain
  • Re: [VOTE] Naming of the `.batch(size=)` method in AIP-104 (Iterable Tasks) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Naming of the `.batch(size=)` method in AIP-104 (Iterable Tasks) Przemysław Mirowski
• [DISCUSS] Proposal for "Time-Travel Pipeline Runs" Daniyar Nurtailakov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for "Time-Travel Pipeline Runs" Ash Berlin-Taylor
• [DISCUSS] Proposal for "Self-Healing Retries" Daniyar Nurtailakov
• Airflow Open Spaces at PyCon TW 2026 dev.wei-lee.me via dev
  • Re: Airflow Open Spaces at PyCon TW 2026 Yeonguk Choo
  • Re: Airflow Open Spaces at PyCon TW 2026 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Airflow Open Spaces at PyCon TW 2026 Wei Lee
  • Re: Airflow Open Spaces at PyCon TW 2026 Jarek Potiuk
• [REMINDER]: Airflow Dev call on 24th September Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [REMINDER]: Airflow Dev call on 24th September Jarek Potiuk
• [DISCUSS] Dynamic discovery of DAG bundle configurations without restart Sameer Raj via dev
• [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Vincent Beck
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Sameer Mesiah
  • RE: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Damian Shaw
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jake McGrath via dev
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Henry Chen
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Vincent Beck
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Henry Chen
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Przemysław Mirowski
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Sumit Maheshwari
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Ankit Chaurasia
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Sameer Mesiah
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jyun-An Chen
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Sameer Mesiah
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Aaron Chen
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Sameer Mesiah
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Andrew Chang
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Christos Bisias
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Yuseok Jo
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Andrew Chang
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Zach Gottesman via dev
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Sean Muth
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Pratiksha Badheka
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Limiting number of opened pull requests for users without write access Jarek Potiuk
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Python Client 3.3.2 Released Rahul Vats
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Python Client 3.3.2 Released Amogh Desai
• [RESULT][VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 3.3.2 from 3.3.2rc2 Rahul Vats
• [DISCUSS] New Community Provider: Modal Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New Community Provider: Modal Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New Community Provider: Modal Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New Community Provider: Modal Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New Community Provider: Modal Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New Community Provider: Modal Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New Community Provider: Modal Kaxil Naik
• [DISCUSS] Separate dag bundle discovery and import roots Sameer Raj
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Separate dag bundle discovery and import roots Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Separate dag bundle discovery and import roots Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Separate dag bundle discovery and import roots Sameer Raj
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Separate dag bundle discovery and import roots Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Separate dag bundle discovery and import roots Sameer Raj
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Separate dag bundle discovery and import roots Jarek Potiuk
• [DISCUSS] Run CI for external contributions in contributor forks Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Run CI for external contributions in contributor forks Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Run CI for external contributions in contributor forks Jyun-An Chen
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Run CI for external contributions in contributor forks Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Run CI for external contributions in contributor forks Ferruzzi, Dennis

• Earlier messages
• Later messages