Good Start Pablo. I will have a detailed look and share a detailed feedback.
Regards, Kaxil On Tue, Mar 19, 2019, 00:48 Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi Max, > The repo is here: https://github.com/aijamalnk/airflow-website > Best > -P. > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 5:32 PM Maxime Beauchemin < > maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm curious to see the source, do you mind sharing the repo? > > > > Side note: I used Gatsby recently and thought it was pretty amazing for > > building static sites and beyond. > > > > Quick nit-picky comments: > > * logo is too small height:50px (along with margin-top: -10px) looks much > > better > > * dark footer needs padding > > > > Max > > > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:57 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy > > <aizha...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > As suggested previously > > > < > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-11+Create+a+Landing+Page+for+Apache+Airflow > > > >, > > > I have been working with Pablo (ccd) on the landing page for Apache > > > Airflow. The site is ready and you can see at > > > https://aijamalnk.github.io/airflow-website/ > > > > > > I would love to hear your thoughts on it, and suggestions for > > improvement. > > > > > > FYI, I have tried using both Jekyll and Hugo for building a new > template > > > for Airflow, but it was taking too much time and the progress was slow. > > > Then I decided to try out Beam’s website code as a template, and it > > suited > > > well for Airflow as open source projects have similar information > > > architecture, eg Documentation, Community, Roadmap, etc. We made sure > to > > > give it a unique look-and-feel for Airflow. I also added some content > > into > > > new pages, like Get Started, Community, Blog. > > > > > > I would love to hear feedback from the community as to whether this > seems > > > like a good landing page for Airflow; and if it does, I’d prepare a > plan > > to > > > bring the landing page into a feature branch of the Airflow repository, > > and > > > work to productionize it. > > > > > > Main areas where I’d like feedback: > > > > > > - > > > > > > Look and feel > > > - > > > > > > Organization of the site > > > - > > > > > > Interface with the existing user docs, and the wiki (see > Documentation > > > section) > > > - > > > > > > How much of the existing documentation is worth moving to a landing > > > page, and how much is worth keeping in ReadTheDocs > > > - > > > > > > If you think the page is on the right track, thoughts on moving > > forward > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Aizhamal > > > > > >
