Would be great if recorded/available later -- have a meeting during the
'live' time.

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 9:09 AM Gabriele Di Bernardo <gdiberna...@bol.com>
wrote:

> Hi Ash,
>
> Are you going to record the session in the end?
>
> Thank you so much!
>
> Best,
>
>
> Gabriele
>
> > On 28 Mar 2019, at 11:35, Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is today. Hope to see you all there.
> >
> > The link below is https://zoom.us/j/458267401
> >
> > My original mail might not have been all that clear on the focus of this
> session: it will be how I work on Airflow itself (rather than using Airflow
> to build dags) especially around running tests etc
> >
> > -ash
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 25 Mar 2019, at 16:21, Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Due to an epic scheduling mix up (also known as I failed to put
> something in my calendar, namely I promised my best man I'd babysit for him
> on Wednesday. Oops!) I am moving this to the next day Thursday, 28th March.
> >>
> >> Thursday 28th Mar at 17:00 GMT/1pm EST/10am PDT
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 22 Mar 2019, at 18:18, Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Airflowers,
> >>>
> >>> Starting with some of the newer engineers at Astronomer, a number of
> people have recently asked me what the best way to develop Airflow is,
> especially when it comes to running tests.
> >>>
> >>> So I thought I'd host a short group hangout this Wednesday 27th Mar at
> 17:00 GMT/1pm EST/10am PDT (note, times are only 4/7 hours apart next week,
> not the usual 5/8) where I'll run through how I hack on Airflow, tricks I
> use for running tests locally (Sneak preview: I never run them all locally,
> it just takes too long!) and will try to answer any questions.
> >>>
> >>> I'll try and record it too for people who can't make it.
> >>>
> >>> I'll follow up with a URL once I work out which platform to use (it
> may be a Google Hangout, or something else)
> >>>
> >>> If you could reply to me OFF LIST so I can get an idea of interest,
> that would be useful, but not required.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Ash
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to