This is very confusing.
+1

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 7:20 PM Christian Lellmann
<christian.lellm...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:

> Me neither. Also from me +1 (non-binding) on removal.
>
> Tao Feng <fengta...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 3. Juli 2019, 18:38:
>
> > I am not aware of this feature either. And +1 on removing it.
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 9:36 AM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I am definitely sure that 99% of users, including me, didn't knew this
> > > feature ever existed 😀.
> > >
> > > It is not a feature worth having tbh. So I am in favor of removing it.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Kaxil
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019, 18:37 James Meickle <jmeic...@quantopian.com
> > .invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I didn't even know this was a feature. Seems like it's unnecessarily
> > > > ambiguous, since you can't tell at a glance whether a variable is a
> dag
> > > or
> > > > a task. Definitely in favor of removal.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 8:49 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm just suggesting removing the `dag >> task` -- `task >> task`
> will
> > > > stay
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 3 Jul 2019, at 13:46, Philippe Gagnon <philgagn...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just to be clear, are you suggesting removing all bitshift
> operator
> > > > > > overloads from airflow operators (sorry - the dual meaning of
> > > operator
> > > > > here
> > > > > > is confusing), or just the assignment to DAG behavior?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If it's the former, I find it to be a particularly expressive way
> > to
> > > > > define
> > > > > > dependencies between tasks so I would vote to keep it as is. The
> > > latter
> > > > > > usage is much less useful, so I would be +1 on removing it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 8:42 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> It is possible to assign a task to the dag using the bitshift
> > > > operators,
> > > > > >> however it doesn't pick up default_args when done this way <
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-883>:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> ```
> > > > > >> dag = DAG('my_dag', default_args=default_args)
> > > > > >> dummy = DummyOperator(task_id='dummy')
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> dag >> dummy
> > > > > >> ```
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> We could fix that, but how about instead we remove this way of
> > > > assigning
> > > > > >> tasks to dags, leaving the context manager (`with dag:`) and
> other
> > > > > >> constructions (`Operator(..., dag=dag)`)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thoughts?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to