+1 (non-binding) from my side. I really like the naming. The only thing I can think of would be to change python to py to have a slightly shorter name.
-feluelle -------- Original Message -------- On Jul 2, 2019, 08:34, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Just to remind - the vote is up till Thursday 7am CEST. W have so far +3 > binding +5 non-binding votes so for now the status is PASS. > > Thanks for all who participated :). I encourage others as well. > > Anticipating positive vote I already implemented the scheme in the upcoming > final commit from AIP-10: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/4938 (but > still can change it before we merge - if we come to different conclusions) > > J. > > On Fri, Jun 28, [2019](tel:2019) at 4:21 AM Philippe Gagnon > <philgagn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Thu, Jun 27, [2019](tel:2019) at 8:58 PM Gerardo Curiel >> <gera...@gerar.do> wrote: >> >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > On 27 June [2019](tel:2019) at 2:57:47 pm, Jarek Potiuk >> > (jarek.pot...@polidea.com) >> > wrote: >> > >> > Hello Airflow community, >> > >> > This email call for a vote on "Labelling scheme" for the docker images we >> > are going to publish at >> > https://cloud.docker.com/u/apache/repository/docker/apache/airflow. The >> > vote will lats for at least 1 week (July 4th, 7am CEST) and at least >> > three +1 (binding) votes have been cast. >> > >> > This is my +1 (binding) vote. >> > >> > The current proposal applies to three types of images we are going to >> have: >> > >> > - *CI slim image* - an image used during CI build containing only >> > Airflow with basic dependencies. It's main use is to run >> > pylint/mypy/flake8/doc steps during the build. It also allows you to run >> > airflow standalone directly from the docker image. >> > - *CI full image* - an image used to run full suite of tests on CI (and >> > very soon easily reproducible locally). This image contains dependencies >> > needed to run all tests of Airflow including some "end-2-end" tests with >> > kerberos/hive/hadoop etc. >> > - *Production optimised image (future)* - an image that will aim to >> > replace Puckel image for production-ready use of Airflow. Proposal for >> that >> > one will be discussed soon. >> > >> > This is the current proposal: >> > >> > *Versions from master (development use only):* >> > >> > - CI slim image *: airflow:master-python3.5-ci-slim, >> > airflow:**master-python3.6-ci-slim, >> > airflow:master-ci-slim*==airflow:master-python3.6-ci-slim >> > - CI full image *: airflow:master-python3.5-ci, >> > airflow:**master-python3.6-ci, >> > airflow:master-ci*==airflow:master-python3.6-ci >> > - Production optimised images: (future): *airflow:master-python3.5, >> > airflow:**master-python3.6, airflow:master*==airflow:master-python3.6 >> > >> > *Release versions:* >> > >> > - CI slim image: *airflow:[1.10.4](tel:1104)-python3.5-ci-slim, >> > **airflow:[1.10.4](tel:1104)-**python3.6-ci-slim, >> > airflow:latest-ci-slim*==airflow:[1.10.4](tel:1104)-python3.6-ci-slim >> > - CI full image: *airflow:[1.10.4](tel:1104)-python3.5-ci, >> > **airflow:[1.10.4](tel:1104)**-python3.6-ci, >> > airflow:latest-ci*==airflow:[1.10.4](tel:1104)-python3.6-ci >> > - Production optimised images (future): >> > *airflow:[1.10.4](tel:1104)-python3.5, * >> > *airflow:[1.10.4](tel:1104)**-python3.6, >> > airflow:latest*==airflow:[1.10.4](tel:1104)-python3.6 >> > >> > J. >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Jarek Potiuk >> > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer >> > >> > M: [+48 660 796 129](tel:+48660796129) <[+48660796129](tel:+48660796129)> >> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> >> > >> > -- >> > Gerardo Curiel // https://gerar.do >> > >> > > -- > > Jarek Potiuk > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > > M: [+48 660 796 129](tel:+48660796129) <[+48660796129](tel:+48660796129)> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
