Kamil, I am not sure what the next steps towards the docs are but should we already update the Pull Request Template and add a reference to the updated section? I think this would make it easier to find the related docs. I am not sure how much we want to describe in that template.
Speaking of this I am feeling that the template also could need some improvements. In some projects I have seen some kind of GitHub App / bot e.g in Flink which checks the PR description. Maybe this can be useful to us, too? Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 09:48, Kamil Breguła <kamil.breg...@polidea.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to inform you that we have order in the integration.rst file. > https://airflow.readthedocs.io/en/latest/integration.html > > As part of the work, a list of hooks and operators was extracted to a > separate file and missing integration have been added. > https://airflow.readthedocs.io/en/latest/operators-and-hooks-ref.html > > I would ask all contributors to add new operators and hooks if > appropriate. This file can reduce the number of questions like - "is > there operator A in Airflow" or others. > > As part of the work, there was also a question of backwards > compatibility of documentation links. > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/6213#pullrequestreview-294842382 > If anyone is interested, I invite you to discuss. > > Thanks
