Not that I want to open Pandora's box :). But I think the longer name - the worse. Provider is quite nice and short.
I agree with plural 'providers' (as we have hooks and operators). So for consistency it should be indeed plural. J. pt., 4 paź 2019, 18:48 użytkownik Chris Palmer <[email protected]> napisał: > My question about Oracle/MySql wasn't a serious one, but I forget sometimes > that sarcasm doesn't come across well on email. > > I guess my objection is that I don't think that 'provider' adds anything of > value. I'm not convinced that there needs to be a level between 'airflow' > and 'google' but if going that route I would advocate for at least the > plural form 'providers' or the more descriptive 'cloud_providers'. > > Chris > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 11:57 AM Kamil Breguła <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We think that only cloud providers should be separated from others, > > because these services are integrated with each other. Very often, > > when you use one cloud provider, you use many services of a given > > provider. Using a single provider solution provides a uniform way of > > authorization, etc. A large number of problems and mechanisms are > > common to one provider. You can see the amount of integration from > > Microsoft, Azure, Google on the reference list. > > https://airflow.readthedocs.io/en/latest/operators-and-hooks-ref.html > > In this list, cloud reference providers have been placed in separate > > tables because they have a very large number of services. If Oracle > > will have many integrations, it is worth emphasizing this fact and > > moving these integrations to a separate place, so that it is easier to > > find them. and use. Keeping all possible files in one place makes it > > very difficult to use them. > > > > Best regards, > > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 5:32 PM Chris Palmer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > This seems unnecessary to me. > > > > > > Is everything going to be under some 'provider' or just certain sets of > > > operators, and if so what differentiates when something should be > under a > > > provider or not? For example, are the mysql operators going to go under > > > 'provider/oracle/'? > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 9:21 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Agree with Ash. > > > > > > > > After doing the gcp move and seeing the result we agreed that > > 'provider' is > > > > better as additional prefix. > > > > > > > > If no-one objects (Lazy Consensus > > > > <https://community.apache.org/committers/lazyConsensus.html>) till > > Monday > > > > 3.20 CEST, we will update AIP-21 and move the gcp operators to > > > > *provider/google/[gcp,gsuite]*. > > > > > > > > J. > > > > > > >
