BTW. I just looked at the blogs - I am also ok with removing the two blogs that we originally had - they were more to seed the "blogs" than intended to drive traffic. It would make more sense to remove them so that we can tell the contributors that we prefer original content.
J On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 4:13 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 3:43 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 for publishing whole blog posts on the Airflow website. >> >> T. >> >> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 3:37 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hey all, >> > >> > I wanted to raise a point regarding our Blog on the Airflow website. >> > >> > There is an open PR: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/231 >> from >> > Chandu Kavar to add 2 blog posts based on his nicely written Airflow >> > testing material. >> > >> > However, the blog post basically links back to the original content on >> > medium instead of providing the content on the website itself. >> > >> > I replied saying we should have the entire content on the website for >> it to >> > be meaningful to serve any purpose. >> > >> > And then I actually checked the currently published blog posts too and >> > found out that some posts are similar. >> > >> > The blog post isn't that useful in that case. >> > >> > So I would like to propose the following guidelines: >> > >> > - The content should be on the Blog Post itself and not something like >> "To >> > Read more visit this website" >> > - Linking to own and other good blogs/article/docs are fine and >> encouraged >> > where it makes sense but not to intentionally drive traffic away from >> the >> > Blog Post >> > >> > Let me know your thoughts. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Kaxil >> > >> > > > -- > > Jarek Potiuk > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> > > -- Jarek Potiuk Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
