Hello Everyone, The vote on the process of backport packages is PASSED
+1 Jarek Potiuk +1 Kaxil Naik +1 Kamil Breguła +1 Tomasz Urbaszek +1 Daniel Imberman I will describe it in more details soon and we are about to finish testing first few provider packages (GCP and a few small ones that GCP depends on such as Postgres/MySql) with system tests so we should be ready to test the release process for those in the next few weeks most likely/ J. On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 4:16 PM Daniel Imberman <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > On Mar 8, 2020, 7:46 AM -0400, Tomasz Urbaszek < > [email protected]>, wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 10:40 PM Kamil Breguła <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 10:29 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 2:36 AM Jarek Potiuk < > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ah sorry. Earlier edits. Disregard this half-sentence please: > > > > > Packages will only > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 8:14 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > "1. Packages are split "per provider". Packages will only" > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfinished line there? > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6 March 2020 14:07:10 GMT-05:00, Jarek Potiuk < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a second attempt for voting on Backport package release > > > process. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is just voting on the process itself, not on the release > of the > > > > > > > packages - we did not do it before so we have no process yet - > so I > > > > > > > would like to agree on that first. The discussion was not very > > > active > > > > > > > but i think the proposal below addresses all concerns people > had so > > > > > > > far. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The voting will last till Tuesday 10 March 8 pm CET. All > committers > > > > > > > have a binding vote. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My proposal for vote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Packages are split "per provider". Packages will only > > > > > > > 2. Whenever there are cross-package dependencies they are > available > > > as > > > > > > > "extras". It is automatically derived from the code - no need > to > > > > > > > maintain it or change existing code. > > > > > > > 3. The packages are testable using system tests and released > only > > > when > > > > > > > system tests pass for those on the latest Airflow version > (1.10.9 > > > > > > > currently) and 3.6 Python version. This is on top of the unit > tests > > > > > > > running in master already. > > > > > > > 4. The packages will be released with CALVER versioning > 2020.03.06 . > > > > > > > Likely in batches after testing is completed. > > > > > > > 5. Status of testing of the packages will be updated in our > wiki > > > page > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Backported+providers+packages+for+Airflow+1.10.*+series > > > > > > > 6. I will be coordinating an effort to add system tests and > test the > > > > > > > packages for as many providers as possible and try to get > people > > > > > > > interested in it. > > > > > > > 7. In the future we will automate such tests providing that we > agree > > > > > > > on it - separate voting on "AIP-4 Support for Automation of > System > > > > > > > Tests for external systems" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is my (binding) +1 vote on it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > More information: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The current list of providers is available here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7506/files#diff-337e7c8a1a7c5e1e9be3c5d8063d7d4cR81 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The current list of cross-dependencies (extras) is available > here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7506/files#diff-ea1f65a8eaac0cec7ae151dfdbbbc587R355 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The proposal was discussed in this thread: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf6f2de8056b00ad084c96a9428670c14421a89ba2bbbd362d833bb50%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a PR that implements "extras" approach for cross-package > > > > > > > dependencies here: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7506 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Related discussion about AIP-4 (Automation of system tests) is > here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8c37e2289e8c8b438acc1415e9f2a1b74cd6feac831e02a17b01d88d%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Jarek Potiuk > > > > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > > > > > > > > > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> > > > > > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Tomasz Urbaszek > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Software Engineer > > > > M: +48 505 628 493 <+48505628493> > > E: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > > > Unique Tech > > Check out our projects! <https://www.polidea.com/our-work> > -- Jarek Potiuk Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
