Hey all, I feel like we have good guidelines on creating an AIP, however, there we don't have "clear" guidelines on the following (We might already do, in which case please correct me):
1. How long should the *Vote *on AIP go on? 2. Minimum number of votes required to marked the AIP as "accepted" 3. What happens when the minimum number of votes is not reached within the deadline we decide for (1)? Should we consider it an implicit "YES" or just wait! Or is it an implicit "not interested in this AIP"? 4. Can someone veto an AIP? We can adopt the *Release Approval* http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval guidelines for AIP too. My Proposed Answer (similar to Apache Release Process): - A *[DISCUSS]* thread is created to discuss the approach and idea. If there is a general interest in the idea and unless there are security concerns or a veto from a PMC member, this will go to a VOTE. - A *[VOTE]* thread is created that would last for at least 3 days *and *until 3 *+1* *binding votes* are obtained. - Binding Votes: PMC and Committers - Non-binding Votes: Members of the community I am happy to document the process once we finalize it. Regards, Kaxil