+1 (binding). Thanks for proceeding this AIP, Ash.
XD On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 22:40 Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > This email calls for a vote on the design proposed in AIP-15, found here > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103092651 > > A few notes > > - The proposed architecture is to use an active/active architecture > where each scheduler is fully capable > - Nothing in this proposal locks us in to this design long term, and if > we find it doesn't work or scale we can change it. > - Lock contention doesn't worry me, as we (plan to) skip locked rows, > meaning that when one scheduler has a DAG locked it will be skipped > over by other schedulers > > This vote will last for 72 hours until 2020-03-20T21:40Z, and until at > least 3 votes have been cast. > > This is my +1 vote. > > Thanks, > Ash > >
