+1 If a user really wants, then this feature can also be implemented using a custom secret backend. This will allow for much better behavior control. It doesn't have to be part of the core.
Best regards, Kamil On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 3:27 PM Bas Harenslak <basharens...@godatadriven.com.invalid> wrote: > > +1 > > > On 24 Apr 2020, at 13:28, Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:31 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> As we discussed in the thread on Spec thread for our new API, the idea > >> came up of making conn_id unique in Airflow > >> > >> < > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb6f7d95b2754fda9dd09b08444214dfad12d10f143d32de0fcf4104%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E > >>> > >> > >> The people in that thread seemed to be in favour of it: > >> > >> - It is often confusing to users (there have been a few bug reports > >> about it over the years) > >> - It's questionable if it actually works well or not > >> - There are better/smarter tools for loadbalancing connections to a DB > >> than picking one of a random list > >> - For Hive at least it has been implemented another way - allowing two > >> host's in a single connection string > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/4708 (available in 1.10.6) > >> - It makes the HTTP API confusing (needing a integer connection ID, and > >> a string conn_id field) > >> > >> Given the downsides/work arounds, and the confusion this causes to I > >> propose we remove this (mis)feature from Airflow 2.0. > >> > >> Kevin from AirBnb (on bcc, hopefully you see this) I would be interested > >> in your vote/view, as I know AirBnB was using this in the past. > >> > >> This vote will last for 96 Hours, until 10:30Z on 2020-04-27 > >> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20200427T1030 > >> > >> Every vote counts here, so please all vote. > >> > >> Options: > >> > >> > >> [ ] +1 approve > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > >> > >> (or fractional values between -1..+1) > >> > >> This is my +1 vote. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Ash > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Jarek Potiuk > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > > > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> > > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> >
