:-D sounds like a plan ;)

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:27 PM Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com>
wrote:

> Next time just put '+1' version Kaxil ;).
>
> J.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:13 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > (copy-paste error - It is our 4th call)
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:10 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I would like to remind everyone that we will have our third developer
> > > call today:
> > >
> > > *Airflow 2.0 Dev Call Calendar Link*:
> > >
> >
> https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=c_dhdh3bdjc42c4ngtnpg7ovcs9g%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=Europe%2FLondon
> > > *Time*: 5:30-6:30 PM GMT
> > > *Zoom Link*:
> > >
> >
> https://astronomer.zoom.us/j/93263978170?pwd=Ym9wMUJUNkc5cnJ0VnNabVRtaVBvZz09
> > >
> > >
> > > Some useful links:
> > >
> > >    - Planning Doc & Meeting Notes:
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+2.0+-+Planning
> > >    - 2.0 Milestone: https://github.com/apache/airflow/milestone/3
> > >    - Issue Tracker: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10152
> > >
> > >
> > > *Agenda for Today's call*:
> > >
> > >    - API
> > >       - Progress, Current Work & Discussions
> > >       - Any open questions?
> > >    - Improvements to SubDags / Concept of TaskGroup
> > >       - *AIP-34*:
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-34+TaskGroup%3A+A+UI+task+grouping+concept+as+an+alternative+to+SubDagOperator
> > >
> > >       - *PR*: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10153
> > >       - Any concerns on including this PR to 2.0 ??
> > >       - Do we want to support both TaskGroup & SubDags?
> > >    - Progress, Current Work & Discussions
> > >       - Scheduler HA
> > >       - Docs Improvements
> > >          - At least if we can narrow down a list of what kind of
> > >          improvements are needed, it would be a plus too
> > >       - Helm Chart
> > >          - Discuss the issue with sources
> > >       - Process:
> > >       - When should we defer the in-scope items to post-2.0
> > >          - Completion by a date?
> > >          - Progress by a date?
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Kaxil
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Jarek Potiuk
> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
>
> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
>

Reply via email to