Re: Providers. At the call I'd love to get the feedback on the way the new automated parts of "providers 2.0" page. Example for google provider here: http://gabby-cough.surge.sh/
Some discussion started by Kamil here: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/13767#discussion_r560629925 and it touches those points: * what should be in the PyPI README * what should be in the Provider's index page (i.e. the proposal at http://gabby-cough.surge.sh/) * whether we should keep together or separate out detailed commit changes (or is it at all needed in the user documentation ?) * do we also want to standardise the structure/content of the "manual" part of per provider documentation Maybe a long subject to discuss, but I would love to get some "acceptable version first so that we can quickly release the second wave of providers. Also maybe this time we could again release all of them (most in 1.0.1 version) to get them consistently released and documented. J. On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 4:14 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to remind whoever is interested to join the Airflow Community > Dev call that we will have our fortnightly dev call later today. > > *Airflow Dev Call Calendar Link*: > https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=c_dhdh3bdjc42c4ngtnpg7ovcs9g%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=Europe%2FLondon > *Time*: 7:30 - 8:30 GMT > *Zoom Link*: > https://astronomer.zoom.us/j/93263978170?pwd=Ym9wMUJUNkc5cnJ0VnNabVRtaVBvZz09 > > > *Agenda for Todays' call:* > > - Airflow 2.0.1 > - Providers Release > - Helm Chart Release > - Upgrade Checks Release > > > Regards, > Kaxil > -- +48 660 796 129
