+1 binding

On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 9:56 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:

> Absolutely!
>
> On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 10:50 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ok for this release but let's not do that going forward intentionally.
>>
>> I would rather not do that, not intentionally atleast i.e. not
>> change/edit the files that we VOTE on.
>>
>> Moving same files between directories is one thing and editing the files
>> the we vote is another.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kaxil
>>
>> On Sat, May 29, 2021, 21:09 Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> We can manually correct filenames in SHASUM while moving. The SHA
>>> remains the same .
>>>
>>> sob., 29 maj 2021, 21:24 użytkownik Kaxil Naik <[email protected]>
>>> napisał:
>>>
>>>> Can we take care of
>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow-client-python/pull/22 and
>>>> re-generate the rc's so once we move them to RELEASE svn repo the SHASUM's
>>>> are not incorrect
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 9:26 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ACK.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:11 AM Sumit Maheshwari <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for validating it Jarek.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> About the open issues, like #20
>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/airflow-client-python/issues/20> or #21,
>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/airflow-client-python/issues/21> I'm not
>>>>>> 100% sure but I feel that the issue lies within Airflow's Openapis
>>>>>> definition manifest itself. So once they get fixed in Airflow, there 
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> be a new Airflow release & subsequently there will be a new client 
>>>>>> release,
>>>>>> which would have a fix for these issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:02 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (binding) : checked shasums, signatures, licences. Run the API
>>>>>>> client with example calls against the latest airflow. and the issue #15 
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> gone.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One question: The issue (read only dag_id) :
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow-client-python/issues/21 is still
>>>>>>> there, but do I understand correctly this is a "known issue" and we are
>>>>>>> waiting for new version of Open API generator ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> J
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:25 AM Sumit Maheshwari <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have cut the first release candidate for the Airflow Python
>>>>>>>> Client 2.1.0. The client consists of APIs corresponding to REST APIs
>>>>>>>> available in *Apache Airflow 2.1.0* release. This email is calling
>>>>>>>> a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours. Consider this my
>>>>>>>> (binding) +1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Airflow Client 2.1.0.rc1 is available at:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/clients/python/2.1.0rc1/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or also available at PyPI:
>>>>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-client/2.1.0rc1/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *airflow-client-2.1.0rc1-source.tar.gz* is a source release that
>>>>>>>> comes with INSTALL instructions.
>>>>>>>> *airflow-client-2.1.0rc1-bin.tar.gz* is the binary Python "sdist"
>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Public keys are available at:
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but the release manager
>>>>>>>> should encourage members of the community to test the release and vote 
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> "(non-binding)".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Changelog*:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Major changes:*Client code is generated using OpenApi's 5.1.1
>>>>>>>> generator CLI
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Major fixes:*Fixed the iteration issue on array items caused by
>>>>>>>> unsupported class 'object' (issue #15)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *New API supported:*Permissions
>>>>>>>> Plugins
>>>>>>>> Providers
>>>>>>>> Roles
>>>>>>>> Users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Sumit Maheshwari
>>>>>>>> PMC Apache Airflow
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> +48 660 796 129
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> +48 660 796 129
>>>>>
>>>>
>
> --
> +48 660 796 129
>

Reply via email to