I added the Status issue as well: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19558

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 9:36 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Correction: Vote will last until Monday, November 15, 2021 at 00:00 UTC or 
> until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 8:03 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hey fellow Airflowers,
>>
>> I have cut Airflow 2.2.2rc2. This email is calling a vote on the release,
>> which will last until Monday, October 15, 2021 at 00:00 UTC or until 3 
>> binding +1 votes have been received.
>>
>> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=8&iso=20211115T0000&p1=1440
>>
>> Consider this my +1 (binding) vote.
>>
>> Airflow 2.2.2rc2 is available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/2.2.2rc2/
>>
>> apache-airflow-2.2.2-source.tar.gz is a source release that comes with 
>> INSTALL instructions.
>> apache-airflow-2.2.2.tar.gz is the binary Python "sdist" release.
>> apache_airflow-2.2.2-py3-none-any.whl is the binary Python wheel "binary" 
>> release.
>>
>> Public keys are available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>>
>> Please vote accordingly:
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>
>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the community
>> are encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>>
>> The test procedure for PMCs and Contributors who would like to test this RC 
>> are described in
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_AIRFLOW.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmcs
>>
>> Please note that the version number excludes the `rcX` string, so it's now
>> simply 2.2.2. This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>>
>> Full Changelog: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/2.2.2rc2/CHANGELOG.txt
>>
>> Changes since 2.2.2rc1:
>>
>> Bug Fixes:
>> - Fix missing dagruns when ``catchup=True`` (#19528)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kaxil

Reply via email to