Hello Everyone, The best time for meeting #3 for multi-tenancy seems to be Wednesday, Jan 19, 8pm CET. I will prepare a more detailed agenda Monday afternoon - please ping me if you would like to present something during the meeting.
Event link here: https://calendar.google.com/event?action=TEMPLATE&tmeid=MDJkamJkaWpnbWozdWJpbmd1Z3JsNWprYTUgcG90aXVrLmFwYWNoZS5vcmdAbQ&tmsrc=potiuk.apache.org%40gmail.com Airflow Multi-Tenancy meeting #3 Wednesday, January 19 · 20:00 – 21:00 CET Google Meet joining info Video call link: https://meet.google.com/gsq-vvmi-cxq Or dial: (PL) +48 22 163 87 73 PIN: 923 532 639# More phone numbers: https://tel.meet/gsq-vvmi-cxq?pin=3847645906103 I will record the meeting and post both notes and the recording afterwards. J. On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 12:55 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Since we are past the holidays I would like to call for a follow-up > meeting about the multi-tenancy next steps (next week). > > I started a Doodle here: please mark your availability. I will pick > the time by Thursday night and announce it on Friday. > > https://doodle.com/poll/s95p29gbhg2gtx4b?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link > > We have those two AIP-s which are being discussed: > > * AIP-43 - DagProcessor separation: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-43+DAG+Processor+separation > * AIP-44 - Airflow Internal API: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-44+Airflow+Internal+API > > As opposed to the first versions of those, there were not many > comments on the last iteration (which might be both a good and bad > sign). But I would like (if possible) to reach some conclusions and > consensus around those two AIPs as the most important part of the > meeting. So I encourage everyone who has an interest to comment on > those two proposals now - in asynchronous fashion, as we will not be > able to have deep discussion on-line with multiple people. > > Both Mateusz and myself are available for discussion also > #sig-multitenancy at our slack - feel free to discuss related stuff > there. > > I know there are also several other proposals - related to those - so > please raise them here but I would like to focus on the AIP-43, AIP-44 > - I will reserve time during the meeting that other, follow-up or > separate proposals can be presented by the authors. Please let me know > if you would like to present/describe your ideas/proposals (shortly) > during the meeting. > > > J.
