I’m leaning toward Ash approach. Having providers maintaining the packages may streamline many aspects for providers/companies.
1. They are owners so they can merge and release whenever they need. 2. It’s easier for them to add E2E tests and manage the resources needed for running them. 3. The development of the package can be incorporated into their company processes - not every company is used to OSS mode. Whatever way we go - we should have some basics guidelines and requirements (for example to brand a provider as “recommended by community” or something). Cheers, Tomsk
