Good. I will call for lazy consensus then :)
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 12:23 AM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah agreed with QP -- I think we should start with experimental support > > On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 16:53, Eloi Codina <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I also think it would be great enabling experimental ARM images. In my case, >> I could test Airflow on a small ARM-based server before installing it on our >> production server. >> >> >> >> On 2022/04/13 11:53:32 Jarek Potiuk wrote: >> >> > Hey everyone, >> >> > >> >> > We have a CI image multi-platform image (including ARM64) platform for >> >> > a few weeks and - to be perfectly honest - it's heaven and earth >> >> > compared to the emulated image. >> >> > >> >> > Except running tests and supporting mssql and mysql - we **could** if >> >> > we want to push a multiplatform image when we release as well. It will >> >> > take a while to get proper testing in CI but I am inclined to release >> >> > the ARM part of the image as "experimental" support in 2.3.0 even >> >> > before we do it and give it in the hands of our users. >> >> > >> >> > Honestly I don't expect many problems in Airflow - i expect many more >> >> > in numpys/pandas and other low-level scientific libraries, and having >> >> > no support for MySQL and MSSQL for those images is a good one as we >> >> > will remove some of the error-factors from people experimenting with >> >> > it. >> >> > >> >> > That will allow people who work with Mac OS M1s or use newer Raspberry >> >> > PIs or simply experiment with migration to ARM based server >> >> > infrastructure to test and run "production" Airflow. >> >> > >> >> > There is a bigger "platform war" gearing up - with cloud providers >> >> > ramping up their server side ARM support so we might well - in a year >> >> > or two - be in the situation that ARM-based servers are becoming very >> >> > popular and people will want to run Airflow there. >> >> > >> >> > WDYT? >> >> > >> >> Sent from Mail for Windows >> >>
