The PR updated - I think that solves the main problem I had with the ballooning number of images :). I guess with adding just one parallel "slim" image to already existing images is far less controversial so I will call for a lazy consensus :)
Thanks Jed It's quite obvious when you mentioned it, I wonder why I have not thought about it before ). This is how the convention will look like then. +----------------+------------------+---------------------------------+--------------------------------------+ | Image | Python | Standard image | Slim image | +================+==================+=================================+======================================+ | Latest default | 3.7 | apache/airflow:latest | apache/airflow:slim-latest | | Default | 3.7 | apache/airflow:X.Y.Z | apache/airflow:slim-X.Y.Z | | Latest | 3.7,3.8,3.9,3.10 | apache/airflow:latest-pythonN.M | apache/airflow:slim-latest-pythonN.M | | Specific | 3.7,3.8,3.9,3.10 | apache/airflow:X.Y.Z-pythonN.M | apache/airflow:slim-X.Y.Z-pythonN.M | +----------------+------------------+---------------------------------+--------------------------------------+ J. On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 10:28 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah. Indeed it's almost no difference, that will simplify things a lot. > Good Idea Jed. I will update the PR to reflect it :) > > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 10:17 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Good point. Let me try :) >> >> >> On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 5:57 AM Jed Cunningham <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> How much bigger would the image be if we included postgres, mysql, and >>> mssql in the same image? That'd mean we'd have 4 vs 12 (ignoring the >>> platform piece), and might be worth the tradeoff. >>> >>
