+ 1 (binding) On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 2:05 PM Phani Kumar <phani.ku...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), let's do it ! > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:29 PM Igor Kholopov <ikholo...@google.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding), let's make it happen! >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:12 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <turbas...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding), OpenTelemetry is great! >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:14, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Big +1 (binding) from me. I took part in preparing it and I see more >>>> and more need from users who want it. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:26 PM Howard Yoo <howard...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks I've >>>>> caught so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with >>>>> OpenTelemetry >>>>> Support for Airflow, and I would like to call for a vote on >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow >>>>> >>>>> The vote will last for 7 business days, until 2022/06/22 at 20:00 UTC. >>>>> >>>>> To briefly introduce you to this AIP, the proposal describes >>>>> implementing how Airflow can be instrumented to emit metrics, traces, and >>>>> logs in a common open specification called OpenTelemetry ( >>>>> opentelemetry.io). The proposal was based on the several POC's that >>>>> were conducted to test the feasibility of the specification. >>>>> >>>>> Personally I believe this would greatly help Airflow to become better >>>>> 'observed' by many different monitoring tools out there, with better ways >>>>> to expose and also customize telemetry data for many critical use cases. >>>>> >>>>> If anyone has any changes you think are fundamental/foundational to >>>>> the core idea you have 1 business week to raise it :). >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for all your help in making this proposal possible, >>>>> >>>>> Howard >>>>> >>>>
