I understand the frustration with the SLA feature as it stands. I struggled with trying to understand this early on and finally understood how they were broken.
Having said that, I believe that Airflow users strongly care about the timeliness and consequently SLAs of their data. I also believe that these need to be redefined on top of Datasets in AIP-48 (as Ash mentioned earlier). In summary, my view is that this needs to be redefined and fixed in Airflow, rather than entirely removed from Airflow. Having said that, I also believe that people will want to build advanced SLA capabilities on top of Airflow, but that's completely reasonable in my book. On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:33 AM Daniel Standish <daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > I also think SLAs make sense in airflow and think we should fix the > feature. >
