+1 (non-binding) This would be a great improvement.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:24 AM Igor Kholopov <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 6:27 PM Darren Weber <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> +1 >> >> This turned out to be a sticking point while considering AIP-28 (replaced >> by AIP-40) >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 8:44 AM Xiaodong Deng <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Just read through the AIP. It reads nice & solid 👍 >>> >>> +1 binding. >>> >>> >>> XD >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 2:16 AM Tomasz Urbaszek <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 binding. I personally added some of the coupling ifs😀 >>>> >>>> T. >>>> >>>
