@Kaxil > Would you be willing to maintain the provider in your own repos? > And if accepted to Apache Airflow repo, would you or someone you know would be open to maintaining it with newer APIs?
I'm guessing these are mutually exclusive options, correct? I'd be open to either one. Having a separate release cadence and isolated CI/CD seems like a nice pro. > One major con is it won't be part of Airflow constraints file. What is the implication of this? Re: hosting my own repos, a few other questions I have are: - How would I make this provider discoverable to Airflow users? Is the Astronomer registry the main venue for this or are there others? - Would I be able to contribute updates to this docs page, adding pandera as one of the supported tools? https://docs.astronomer.io/learn/data-quality -NB
