Added reference for this thread in relevant release docs
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30037

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:12 PM Pierre Jeambrun <[email protected]>
wrote:

> 72 hours have passed, we will start using this policy for our future
> releases.
>
> Thanks
>
> Le mar. 7 mars 2023 à 21:29, Ferruzzi, Dennis <[email protected]
> >
> a écrit :
>
> > +1 (non-bindingly lazy)
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Pierre Jeambrun <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 12:11 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [LAZY CONSENSUS] Allow shorter voting periods for
> > subsequent RCs
> >
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> know
> > the content is safe.
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > *Context:*Having a 72h vote window on each subsequent RCs can slow down
> the
> > release process, bring some annoyance and add load on the release
> manager.
> > This could be avoided, especially when the new RC only ships a few extra
> > commits. This proposal would bring some flexibility to the voting process
> > against subsequent RCs. (rcX with X > 1)
> >
> > *Proposal:*
> > For Airflow Core, Providers and API Clients, at the discretion of the RM,
> > subsequent RCs vote windows can be shortened down to a hard minimum of 24
> > hours. Also the sum of all voting windows for a specific release cannot
> be
> > shorter than 72h.
> >
> > *Examples:*
> > - An issue was found on rc1 after 24h then rc2 voting window can be
> > shortened down to 48h.
> > - An issue was found on rc1 after 70h then rc2 voting window can be
> > shortened down to 24h. (hard minimum)
> > - An issue was found on rc1 after 12h then rc2 voting window can be
> > shortened down to 60h.
> > - An issue was found on rc1 after 12h and an issue was found on rc2 after
> > 24h then rc3 voting window can be shortened down to 36h. If an issue is
> > then found on rc3 after 24h, rc4 can be shortened down to 24h. (hard
> > minimum again)
> >
> > *Discussion thread:*
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8rpq06pobp6rnm9phnbc9fz4ky32sm16
> >
> > After 72 hours, unless there is an objection, this proposal will be
> adopted
> > and we can start applying it to our releases.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Pierre
> >
>

Reply via email to