You can see all the discussions in
https://lists.apache.org/[email protected]. The SLA
discussion is in progress in the google docs for now (soon to be
converted into cwiki AIP).

J,

On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 10:15 PM Damian Shaw
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'm missing the previous conversation / who this is replying to and I don't 
> see a new AIP yet, is this still in progress?
>
> I would definitely want to be able provide feedback on an AIP for SLAs, while 
> the current SLA system is limited I am making heavy usage of it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2023 4:29 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow - New SLA AIP
>
> > Jarek - thank you for the suggestions - those are great suggestions in 
> > enhancing the proposal... Regarding your first point - how does deprecating 
> > an existing feature work for Airflow? Do we need to give a grace period of 
> > a minor or major patch over which we continue to support the feature after 
> > marking it for deprecation? Or do we remove them right away on a major 
> > version / minor version update?
>
> We raise a deprecation warning. You can see a number of examples in a number 
> of places. We cannot remove them in minor. We have not yet discussed the 
> timeline for Airflow 3 - but that is  the first time when things can get 
> removed.
>
> > Also, do you folks have any thoughts on my last point listed in 'Other 
> > Considerations' section? I've highlighted the section to make it easier to 
> > identify, and I think it's an edge case that would be worth thinking about.
>
> responded in the doc.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> ________________________________
>  Strike Technologies, LLC (“Strike”) is part of the GTS family of companies. 
> Strike is a technology solutions provider, and is not a broker or dealer and 
> does not transact any securities related business directly whatsoever. This 
> communication is the property of Strike and its affiliates, and does not 
> constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any 
> security in any jurisdiction. It is intended only for the person to whom it 
> is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or 
> otherwise protected from disclosure. Distribution or copying of this 
> communication, or the information contained herein, by anyone other than the 
> intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this communication in 
> error, please immediately notify Strike at [email protected], and 
> delete and destroy any copies hereof.
> ________________________________
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY / PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This transmission and any attachments are 
> intended solely for the addressee. This transmission is covered by the 
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C ''2510-2521. The information 
> contained in this transmission is confidential in nature and protected from 
> further use or disclosure under U.S. Pub. L. 106-102, 113 U.S. Stat. 1338 
> (1999), and may be subject to attorney-client or other legal privilege. Your 
> use or disclosure of this information for any purpose other than that 
> intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to 
> fines and/or penalties under federal and state law. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this transmission, please DESTROY ALL COPIES RECEIVED 
> and confirm destruction to the sender via return transmittal.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to