+1 (non-binding)

My only concern is confusion between DAG.on_sla_miss_callback and the
deprecated DAG.sla_miss_callback due to their very similar names, but I
don't have a better idea.

On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 1:34 PM Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr> wrote:

> Sorry, I voted from the wrong email
>
> +1 binding
>
> On Mon 24 Jul 2023 at 20:07, rahul Vats <rah.sharm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > Looking forward to this.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rahul Vats
> > 9953794332
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 23:27, Oliveira, Niko <oniko...@amazon.com.invalid
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Looking forward to this one! I think the new behaviours will be much
> > > better than we have now.
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Utkarsh Sharma <utkarsh.sha...@astronomer.io.INVALID>
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 11:45:57 PM
> > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
> > >
> > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> > > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> > know
> > > the content is safe.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 (non binding)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 11:57 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding).
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 7:56 PM Damian Shaw <
> > > ds...@striketechnologies.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (Non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Although I would like to see some version of the proposed "SlaTask"
> > > > > workaround included in Airflow itself so that:
> > > > >         1) Tests can be added to make sure other Airflow changes
> > don't
> > > > > break assumptions about how it would work, even if people mostly
> > > implement
> > > > > their own version, they can use this one as a base and know it
> works
> > > > >         2) People can start migrating away from the current SLA
> > > mechanism
> > > > > as soon as possible
> > > > >
> > > > > Damian
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Sung Yun <sy...@cornell.edu>
> > > > > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 1:09 PM
> > > > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear Airflow community,
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to start a vote for "AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature"
> > > > >
> > > > > You can find the AIP here:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-57+Refactored+SLA+Feature
> > > > >
> > > > > Discussion threads:
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kn1rb9l70jk16j83fycp68l2g70wnhzl
> > > > >
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kj33fwd9otbbm52my9j3y39rp547g0n5
> > > > >
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l2ho7w18d11vcnon7dxoxghzxhtjw5hf
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This is my (non-binding) +1, the vote will last until 1pm PST July
> > > 24th,
> > > > > and until at least 3 binding votes have been cast.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] + 1 approve
> > > > > [ ] + 0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > >
> > > > > Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other
> > > members
> > > > > of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with
> > > > > "(non-binding)".
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > >  Strike Technologies, LLC (“Strike”) is part of the GTS family of
> > > > > companies. Strike is a technology solutions provider, and is not a
> > > broker
> > > > > or dealer and does not transact any securities related business
> > > directly
> > > > > whatsoever. This communication is the property of Strike and its
> > > > > affiliates, and does not constitute an offer to sell or the
> > > solicitation of
> > > > > an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction. It is intended
> only
> > > for
> > > > > the person to whom it is addressed and may contain information that
> > is
> > > > > privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure.
> > > > > Distribution or copying of this communication, or the information
> > > contained
> > > > > herein, by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
> If
> > > you
> > > > > have received this communication in error, please immediately
> notify
> > > Strike
> > > > > at i...@striketechnologies.com, and delete and destroy any copies
> > > hereof.
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY / PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This transmission and any
> > > attachments
> > > > > are intended solely for the addressee. This transmission is covered
> > by
> > > the
> > > > > Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C ''2510-2521. The
> > > > > information contained in this transmission is confidential in
> nature
> > > and
> > > > > protected from further use or disclosure under U.S. Pub. L.
> 106-102,
> > > 113
> > > > > U.S. Stat. 1338 (1999), and may be subject to attorney-client or
> > other
> > > > > legal privilege. Your use or disclosure of this information for any
> > > purpose
> > > > > other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited,
> > > and may
> > > > > subject you to fines and/or penalties under federal and state law.
> If
> > > you
> > > > > are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please DESTROY
> > ALL
> > > > > COPIES RECEIVED and confirm destruction to the sender via return
> > > > > transmittal.
> > > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to