+1 from me, Seems reasonable -- Regards, Aritra Basu
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023, 8:40 PM Josh Fell <josh.d.f...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > It all seems very reasonable to me. +1 > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 9:23 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > Following our process [1] I am calling for a lazy consensus on suspending > > (for now) quibole provider > > > > Qubole has been acquired and seems that maintainers have left the project > > https://github.com/qubole/qds-sdk-py#where-are-the-maintainers- > > the package has been unmaintained for a long time and it's likely no-one > > uses it > > until someone steps up to maintain it, we should suspend it > > > > Just to remind - suspending means that we stop releasing new versions of > > the provider, building documentation and running tests. Also dependencies > > of that provider will not contribute to the CI image of ours (including > > deprecated boto3 which it held us to). > > > > Note - since the service seems discontinued - we might consider further > > actions for that one - we have not yet gone through the process of moving > > our code to "attic" (this is the process in ASF where you want to remove > > some of the code that you released). If we do not hear from users that > they > > miss qubole we might also want to introduce the process of moving > > unmaintained providers to the attic. But let's suspend it first. > > > > The lazy consensus will run till Friday 1st of October 2023 3.30pm. > > > > [1] > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/PROVIDERS.rst#suspending-releases-for-providers > > > > J. > > >