+1 from me,
Seems reasonable

--
Regards,
Aritra Basu

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023, 8:40 PM Josh Fell <josh.d.f...@astronomer.io.invalid>
wrote:

> It all seems very reasonable to me. +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 9:23 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Following our process [1] I am calling for a lazy consensus on suspending
> > (for now) quibole provider
> >
> > Qubole has been acquired and seems that maintainers have left the project
> > https://github.com/qubole/qds-sdk-py#where-are-the-maintainers-
> > the package has been unmaintained for a long time and it's likely no-one
> > uses it
> > until someone steps up to maintain it, we should suspend it
> >
> > Just to remind - suspending means that we stop releasing new versions of
> > the provider, building documentation and running tests. Also dependencies
> > of that provider will not contribute to the CI image of ours (including
> > deprecated boto3 which it held us to).
> >
> > Note - since the service seems discontinued - we might consider further
> > actions for that one - we have not yet gone through the process of moving
> > our code to "attic" (this is the process in ASF where you want to remove
> > some of the code that you released). If we do not hear from users that
> they
> > miss qubole we might also want to introduce the process of moving
> > unmaintained providers to the attic. But let's suspend it first.
> >
> > The lazy consensus will run till Friday 1st of October 2023 3.30pm.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/PROVIDERS.rst#suspending-releases-for-providers
> >
> > J.
> >
>

Reply via email to