-1 (binding) on common.io Provider
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-io/1.0.1rc1/

It isn't going to work with Airflow 2.7.*, it needs code that is main
(airflow.io.store.*)



On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 at 12:57, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:

> One thing to add to my +1.
>
> I have not mentioned it before, but I promised to the team contributing
> the new LLM providers to review the double check licences / dependencies of
> our new LLM providers.
>
> Just to confirm, it all looks good.
>
> We do not have a strict requirement to adhere to a permissive licence for
> providers, because they are "optional" components of Airflow but we are
> better than this:
>
> * All the direct libraries we use belong to "Category A"
> https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a. T
> * There are is one transitive dependency (*tqdm*) that is in "Category B"
> https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b -> this i
> "weak-copyleft" but allowed by the ASF - Mozilla Public licence. It has
> proper attribution in the "openai" client, so we do not have to mention
> them (because they do).
>
> Also as a side comment:
>
> Currently our automated licence check only checks if our sources have
> appropriate licensing information. But in the future, when we complete SBOM
> implementation (part of our Security Improvements work) - we will be able
> to automate those licence checks, because the tool we are using (cdxgen) to
> generate SBOM has also all the information about licences used by the
> dependencies of Airflow, so we will be able to verify compliance with
> licences in automated way for any new dependencies we will be using.
>
> This is a nice side effect of the security-related improvements we work on
> :). Something not immediately visible for users and even contributors, but
> it puts very strong foundations to Airflow's stability and "enterprise"
> readiness - both security processes and licensing compliance being expected
> from Airflow by the enterprise users.
>
> J.
>
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 6:27 PM Aritra Basu <aritrabasu1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> > Tested out against some test dags
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Aritra Basu
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Nov 2023, 6:35 pm Pankaj Koti, <pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
> > .invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Concurring with Rahul Vats on the testing of the mentioned providers.
> > >
> > > A big thank you to Elad for skillfully overseeing and synchronizing
> this
> > > release
> > > with impeccable timing. We (Astronomer) truly value this effort and are
> > > enthusiastic
> > > about the establishment of a placeholder and initial space in  Airflow
> > for
> > > the new
> > > LLM providers (Cohere, OpenAI, Pinecone, pgvector and Weaviate).
> > > We anticipate that this development will be advantageous for the
> > community
> > > and
> > > eagerly invite contributions from members of the Airflow + LLM
> community
> > to
> > > enhance the robustness and feature completeness of these providers.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > *Pankaj Koti*
> > > Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
> > > Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
> > > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
> > > Phone: +91 9730079985
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 5:53 PM Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding) I checked the checksums, the signatures, the licences
> and
> > > the
> > > > sources, all looks good.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed 8 Nov 2023 at 22:10, Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email
> > is
> > > > > calling a vote on the release,
> > > > > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on
> > November
> > > > 11,
> > > > > 2023 21:10 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > > > >
> > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > > > >  Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> > > > provider
> > > > > packages.
> > > > >
> > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > > > >  Python "wheel" release.
> > > > >
> > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > > > >
> > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this
> > RC
> > > is
> > > > > described in:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Public keys are available at:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the
> community
> > > are
> > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > > > >
> > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> > > > >
> > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35540
> > > > >
> > > > > You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the
> > below
> > > > > links:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/8.11.0rc1/
> > > > >
> > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/4.4.0rc1/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/7.9.0rc1/
> > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cohere/1.0.0rc1/
> > > > >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-io/1.0.1rc1/
> > > > >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/5.0.0rc1/
> > > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-discord/3.4.1rc1/
> > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-docker/3.8.1rc1/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/5.1.1rc1/
> > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-ftp/3.6.1rc1/
> > > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.11.1rc1/
> > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-http/4.7.0rc1/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/8.2.0rc1/
> > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openai/1.0.0rc1/
> > > > >
> > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openlineage/1.2.1rc1/
> > > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-pgvector/1.0.0rc1/
> > > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-pinecone/1.0.0rc1/
> > > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/5.8.0rc1/
> > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-qubole/3.4.3rc1/
> > > > >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-salesforce/5.5.1rc1/
> > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-slack/8.4.0rc1/
> > > > >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/5.1.1rc1/
> > > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-weaviate/1.0.0rc1/
> > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/3.6.0rc1/
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Elad Kalif
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to