Hmm interesting we already had 1.0 release for that provider so releasing 1.0.1 is no different :shrug:
I rescind my -1 (binding), to +0 (binding) --- because I don't see how that provider is going to be used without Airflow 2.8 and the code is still getting worked out On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 at 13:44, Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI: It contains Airflow 2.8 as requirement which is good but really this > provider right now, doesn't make much sense as the code path can change > until Airflow 2.8 is cut > > On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 at 13:42, Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -1 (binding) on common.io Provider >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-io/1.0.1rc1/ >> >> It isn't going to work with Airflow 2.7.*, it needs code that is main >> (airflow.io.store.*) >> >> >> >> On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 at 12:57, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> One thing to add to my +1. >>> >>> I have not mentioned it before, but I promised to the team contributing >>> the new LLM providers to review the double check licences / dependencies >>> of >>> our new LLM providers. >>> >>> Just to confirm, it all looks good. >>> >>> We do not have a strict requirement to adhere to a permissive licence for >>> providers, because they are "optional" components of Airflow but we are >>> better than this: >>> >>> * All the direct libraries we use belong to "Category A" >>> https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a. T >>> * There are is one transitive dependency (*tqdm*) that is in "Category B" >>> https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b -> this i >>> "weak-copyleft" but allowed by the ASF - Mozilla Public licence. It has >>> proper attribution in the "openai" client, so we do not have to mention >>> them (because they do). >>> >>> Also as a side comment: >>> >>> Currently our automated licence check only checks if our sources have >>> appropriate licensing information. But in the future, when we complete >>> SBOM >>> implementation (part of our Security Improvements work) - we will be able >>> to automate those licence checks, because the tool we are using (cdxgen) >>> to >>> generate SBOM has also all the information about licences used by the >>> dependencies of Airflow, so we will be able to verify compliance with >>> licences in automated way for any new dependencies we will be using. >>> >>> This is a nice side effect of the security-related improvements we work >>> on >>> :). Something not immediately visible for users and even contributors, >>> but >>> it puts very strong foundations to Airflow's stability and "enterprise" >>> readiness - both security processes and licensing compliance being >>> expected >>> from Airflow by the enterprise users. >>> >>> J. >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 6:27 PM Aritra Basu <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > +1 (non binding) >>> > Tested out against some test dags >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Regards, >>> > Aritra Basu >>> > >>> > On Fri, 10 Nov 2023, 6:35 pm Pankaj Koti, <[email protected] >>> > .invalid> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > +1 (non-binding) >>> > > >>> > > Concurring with Rahul Vats on the testing of the mentioned providers. >>> > > >>> > > A big thank you to Elad for skillfully overseeing and synchronizing >>> this >>> > > release >>> > > with impeccable timing. We (Astronomer) truly value this effort and >>> are >>> > > enthusiastic >>> > > about the establishment of a placeholder and initial space in >>> Airflow >>> > for >>> > > the new >>> > > LLM providers (Cohere, OpenAI, Pinecone, pgvector and Weaviate). >>> > > We anticipate that this development will be advantageous for the >>> > community >>> > > and >>> > > eagerly invite contributions from members of the Airflow + LLM >>> community >>> > to >>> > > enhance the robustness and feature completeness of these providers. >>> > > >>> > > Best regards, >>> > > >>> > > *Pankaj Koti* >>> > > Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team) >>> > > Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India >>> > > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) >>> > > Phone: +91 9730079985 >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 5:53 PM Hussein Awala <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > +1 (binding) I checked the checksums, the signatures, the licences >>> and >>> > > the >>> > > > sources, all looks good. >>> > > > >>> > > > On Wed 8 Nov 2023 at 22:10, Elad Kalif <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > > Hey all, >>> > > > > >>> > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This >>> email >>> > is >>> > > > > calling a vote on the release, >>> > > > > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on >>> > November >>> > > > 11, >>> > > > > 2023 21:10 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been >>> received. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Airflow Providers are available at: >>> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ >>> > > > > >>> > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary >>> > > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for >>> the >>> > > > provider >>> > > > > packages. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary >>> > > > > Python "wheel" release. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members >>> > > > > >>> > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test >>> this >>> > RC >>> > > is >>> > > > > described in: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Public keys are available at: >>> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Please vote accordingly: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > [ ] +1 approve >>> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion >>> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the >>> community >>> > > are >>> > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. >>> > > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying >>> > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept >>> here: >>> > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35540 >>> > > > > >>> > > > > You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the >>> > below >>> > > > > links: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/8.11.0rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/4.4.0rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/7.9.0rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cohere/1.0.0rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-io/1.0.1rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/5.0.0rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-discord/3.4.1rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-docker/3.8.1rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/5.1.1rc1/ >>> > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-ftp/3.6.1rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.11.1rc1/ >>> > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-http/4.7.0rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/8.2.0rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openai/1.0.0rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openlineage/1.2.1rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-pgvector/1.0.0rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-pinecone/1.0.0rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/5.8.0rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-qubole/3.4.3rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-salesforce/5.5.1rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-slack/8.4.0rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/5.1.1rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-weaviate/1.0.0rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/3.6.0rc1/ >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Cheers, >>> > > > > Elad Kalif >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >>
