+1 (non-binding)

We tested it with our example DAGs with "apache-airflow-providers-amazon", 
"apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes", 
"apache-airflow-providers-databricks", "apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud", 
"apache-airflow-providers-google", "apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes", 
"apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure", 
"apache-airflow-providers-snowflake" and everything works as expected. Thanks!

Best,
Wei

> On Nov 27, 2023, at 7:51 AM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
> Had some fun discussion changes. Sorry for the fuss :-).
> 
> B.
> 
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 at 21:41, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> 
>> Tested my template changes, signatures, checksum, licences, sources are all
>> good.
>> 
>> I also tested that reproducible builds work great ! I checked out the tag
>> from sources, ran `breeze release-management prepare-provider-packages` and
>> got the packages built locally which had 100% binary compatibility with the
>> packages Elad prepared - this means that we no longer need to verify
>> sources.
>> 
>> As PMC members we can simply diff the .whl/.tar.gz packages produced by the
>> release manager and those that you can build locally using only sources
>> from our repo and official build tools - and we can call it a day.
>> 
>> One step closer to get SASL compliance and Follow the standards of securing
>> the software build/supply chain process: https://reproducible-builds.org/.
>> 
>> J.
>> 
>> On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 7:08 PM Pankaj Koti
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> 
>>> Tested my set of changes, all work fine. Thank you for the release
>> efforts!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>> *Pankaj Koti*
>>> Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
>>> Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
>>> Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
>>> Phone: +91 9730079985
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 10:50 PM Hussein Awala <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1 (binding): checked signatures, checksums, licences, sources and
>> tested
>>>> my changes; all looks good.
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri 24 Nov 2023 at 20:30, Elad Kalif <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email
>> is
>>>>> calling a vote on the release,
>>>>> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on
>> November
>>>> 27,
>>>>> 2023 18:30 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Airflow Providers are available at:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>>>>> 
>>>>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
>>>>> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
>>>> provider
>>>>> packages.
>>>>> 
>>>>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
>>>>> Python "wheel" release.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
>>>>> 
>>>>> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this
>> RC
>>> is
>>>>> described in:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Public keys are available at:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please vote accordingly:
>>>>> 
>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
>>> are
>>>>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
>>>>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
>>>>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35845
>>>>> 
>>>>> You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the
>> below
>>>>> links:
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/8.12.0rc1/
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-impala/1.2.1rc1/
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-atlassian-jira/2.3.0rc1/
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/7.10.0rc1/
>>>>> 
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-io/1.1.0rc1/
>>>>> 
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.8.1rc1/
>>>>> 
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/5.0.1rc1/
>>>>> 
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/3.4.1rc1/
>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-docker/3.8.2rc1/
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/5.2.0rc1/
>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.12.0rc1/
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/8.3.0rc1/
>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-odbc/4.2.0rc1/
>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openai/1.0.1rc1/
>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-opsgenie/5.3.0rc1/
>>>>> 
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-papermill/3.5.0rc1/
>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-redis/3.4.1rc1/
>>>>> 
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/5.1.2rc1/
>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-trino/5.4.1rc1/
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Elad Kalif
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> --
> Bolke de Bruin
> [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to