+1 (non-binding)

Regards,
Rahul Vats
9953794332


On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 12:21, Pankaj Singh <ags.pankaj1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Ran some dags and it worked fine!
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 7:55 AM Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Tested my changes with our example DAG without encountering error
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> > > On Jan 31, 2024, at 6:34 AM, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, licences, signatures,
> checksums -
> > > all good.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 5:42 PM Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hey all,
> > >>
> > >> I have just cut an ad-hoc release for the microsoft.azure provider
> > package.
> > >> This email is calling a vote on the release,
> > >> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on
> February
> > 02,
> > >> 2024 16:40 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > >>
> > >> Airflow Providers are available at:
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > >>
> > >> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > >> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> > provider
> > >> packages.
> > >>
> > >> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > >> Python "wheel" release.
> > >>
> > >> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > >>
> > >> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC
> > is
> > >> described in:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Public keys are available at:
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > >>
> > >> Please vote accordingly:
> > >>
> > >> [ ] +1 approve
> > >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >>
> > >> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
> > are
> > >> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > >>
> > >> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > >> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > >> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> > >>
> > >> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37102
> > >>
> > >> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the
> > RC
> > >> candidates.
> > >> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > documentation
> > >> after the
> > >> RC candidates are released.
> > >>
> > >> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/9.0.0rc1/
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Elad Kalif
> > >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to