Ah! Great idea!

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:22 PM Akash Sharma <2akash111...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2024, 22:50 Briana Okyere,
> <briana.oky...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:42 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey here,
> > >
> > > Following the earlier discussion, I am calling for a lazy consensus on
> > > renaming of our slack channels:
> > >
> > > #development -> *#contributors*
> > > #first-pr-support -> *#new-contributors*
> > > #troubleshooting -> *#user-troubleshooting*
> > > #random -> *#random* (hehe)
> > >
> > > The current #development channel will be archived and we will ask
> people
> > to
> > > add themselves to #contributors if they are working on contributing to
> > > airflow. If they are starting their journey, they will should ask
> > questions
> > > in #new-contributors
> > >
> > > New channel: *#user-best-practices* - this is for sharing best
> practices
> > > with and between users. Let's see how popular it will be - we can close
> > it
> > > if not used.
> > >
> > > Discussion was held here:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/fjswvwg4ttbkr14bhq9s5xkc50h0qc76
> > >
> > > I will run the lazy consensus till Thursday, Feb 15th 2024, 8PM CET (72
> > hrs
> > > from now).
> > >
> > > There is no need or expectation to respond to it if you are in
> agreement.
> > > Lack of response is a silent agreement.
> > >
> > > J.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to