+1 (binding) Check licences, signatures, checksums, and source code. All looks good.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:33 AM Andrey Anshin <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Verify signatures, checksums, files > > > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 20:40, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yep. I saw they tested it in > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37648 . > > Cool :) > > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 5:36 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding): checked reproducibility, licences, signatures, checksums > - > > > all looks good. Have not checked if everything works, I guess Teradata > > team > > > is on it. > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 7:18 AM Elad Kalif <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Hey all, > > >> > > >> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > > >> calling a vote on the release, > > >> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on > February > > >> 26, > > >> 2024 06:15 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. > > >> > > >> Consider this my (binding) +1. > > >> > > >> > > >> Airflow Providers are available at: > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > > >> > > >> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary > > >> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the > > >> provider > > >> packages. > > >> > > >> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary > > >> Python "wheel" release. > > >> > > >> The test procedure for PMC members is described in > > >> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > >> > > >> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC > > is > > >> described in: > > >> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > >> > > >> > > >> Public keys are available at: > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > >> > > >> Please vote accordingly: > > >> > > >> [ ] +1 approve > > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > > >> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > >> > > >> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community > > are > > >> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > >> > > >> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > > >> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > > >> the artifact checksums when we actually release. > > >> > > >> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here: > > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37648 > > >> > > >> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the > > RC > > >> candidates. > > >> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the > > >> documentation > > >> after the > > >> RC candidates are released. > > >> > > >> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links: > > >> > > >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-teradata/2.0.0rc1/ > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> Elad Kalif > > >> > > > > > >
