One wrinkle to the have cake and eat it too approach is deferrable operators. It doesn't seem it would be very practical to resume back into the operator that is nested inside a taskflow function. One solution would be to run the trigger in process like we currently do with `dag.test()`. That would make it non-deferrable in effect. But at least it would run properly. There may be other better solutions.
- Bad mixing of decorated and classic operators (users sho... Jarek Potiuk
- Re: Bad mixing of decorated and classic operators (... Jarek Potiuk
- Re: Bad mixing of decorated and classic operators (... Tzu-ping Chung
- Re: Bad mixing of decorated and classic operato... Bolke de Bruin
- Re: Bad mixing of decorated and classic ope... Andrey Anshin
- Re: Bad mixing of decorated and classic... Jarek Potiuk
- Re: Bad mixing of decorated and cl... Andrey Anshin
- RE: Bad mixing of decorated an... Blain David
- Re: Bad mixing of decorate... Jarek Potiuk
- Re: Bad mixing of decorate... Daniel Standish
- Re: Bad mixing of decorate... Jarek Potiuk
- Re: Bad mixing of decorate... Elad Kalif
- Re: Bad mixing of decorate... Jarek Potiuk
- Re: Bad mixing of decorate... Ash Berlin-Taylor
- Re: Bad mixing of decorate... Jarek Potiuk
- Re: Bad mixing of decorate... Andrey Anshin