+1 binding. Excited to see this happen!
Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 12:11 AM Igor Kholopov <ikholo...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Great to see this happening, hope we will see more proposals towards making > Airflow more flexible! > > Regards, > Igor > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 8:10 PM Daniel Standish > <daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > It doesn’t affect my vote on the API, but I am very strongly against > this > > > one part of the AIP: > > > > … dag_id are namespaced with `<team>:` prefix. > > > This specific part is getting an implementation/code veto from me. We > > made > > > the mistake of overloading one column to store multiple things in > Airflow > > > before, and I’ve dealt with the fallout in other apps in the past. > Trust > > > me: do. not. do. this. > > > > I agree with Ash's sentiment. Is adding a tenant_id or something so > > unpalatable? > > >
