I know it's a lazy consensus, but I want to explicitly +1 this :)

pon., 17 cze 2024 o 11:15 Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> napisał(a):

> Also the discussion was continued there
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjmrv1wc2rxhkvozpvccs4mhgwg5sw2f (for
> posterity)
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:06 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Following the discussion
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/r302p5b03dpyncswn11nkjn98cpb6r5z I would
> > like to call for a lazy consensus on introdiucing "common.compat"
> provider.
> >
> > Summarizing what has been discussed there (and some of my further
> > thoughts):
> >
> > * common.compat provider will contain compatibility code for earlier
> > versions of Airflow, that providers might use in case they need to handle
> > some back-compatibility code (example where it might be needed is here
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39530)
> >
> > * as a rule, we should only keep compatibility code there (including
> > indication of version of Airflow where compatibility code is not needed
> any
> > more). New versions of providers should switch to the "airflow" code
> > gradually as soon as "min airflow version" is bumped to the version where
> > compatibility code is not needed.
> >
> > * the "common.compat" provider should be strictly backwards-compatible.
> We
> > will release version 1.0 and for a foreseeable future we will have to
> keep
> > it compatible in the future, which means that we will get some old
> "compat"
> > code lying around for quite some time. We might change it if we add some
> > retention policies for older versions of providers (We do not have them
> > now). This code should generally be not touched, and does not have to
> have
> > test coverage other than test coverage from providers using it) - so cost
> > of maintenance of that code should be **low** to **none**.
> >
> > * this will also make it possible to get some compatibility code for
> > Airflow 2 / Airflow 3 likely.
> >
> > The lazy consensus will last for 72 HRS and it will be effective as of
> > Thursday 20th of June ~ noon CEST.
> >
> > J.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to