I love it and 100% agree. Thinking "Dag Groups", where you can group dags (static & dynamic) into a subfolder. Tags are great for filtering, but they aren't a replacement for dirs especially at a large scale. We have some deployments with 20k dags and as designed today, it's not navigable at that scale. This could help
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 9:04 AM Blain David <[email protected]> wrote: > Beside the new interface and getting rid off FAB in Airflow 3.0, a cool > and handy feature would be to be able to group multiple DAG's so you could > order them by like domain or whatever grouping you want to achieve. > Okay, you can achieve the same with filtering, and maybe the we could use > that feature to achieve the grouping but still it would make the UI more > convenient to use, especially if you have to manage multiple dynamic DAG's > which are related to the same domain. It would be nice I you could like > create a group which always apply the filtering in a stateful manner. Or > we could opt to really implement a dedicated grouping mechanism so that you > could for example specify in your DAG to which group it belongs. What do > you guys think? I would be willing to help and contribute of course. > > >
