+1 (binding)
Looking forward!

On 2024/08/01 20:13:00 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hello here,
> 
> I reviewed and - I hope - addressed all the comments so far. One most
> recent change in the doc was to allow a connection/variable to belong to
> multiple teams. Also I mentioned a potential future change that will allow
> us to run "per-team" schedulers - leaving the UI/DB schema as the main
> components that are shared between teams.
> 
> I am also fine if this one's delivery will slip to 3.1 - because it has
> many dependencies on other AIPs - and also makes some assumptions on
> the other AIP-s scope when they are not yet fully fleshed out. So some
> implementation details **might** change. the general approach is going to
> stay:
> 
> * not targeting manageable "mutliple tenants" - but more of a small-ish set
> of teams within the same organisation that want to maintain separate
> environments and isolated execution environment
> 
> * common UI and scheduler (potentially per-team schedule) as the main
> "common" piece
> 
> * each team being able to manage their team separately - to the extent of
> parsing DAGs and executing tasks
> 
> The AIP proposal with updates:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-67+Multi-team+deployment+of+Airflow+components
> 
> 
> J.
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org

Reply via email to