Thanks Jarek , I am updating the pr now. Regards, Pavan
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 8:26 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > I provisionally generated and uploaded the .dev0 package > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/1.0.0.dev0/ > from > latest main - and we shall see if everything works as expected (see > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/42252#discussion_r1785222999) > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 1:37 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > > > > >> Mainly for the case of standard provider and the integration > >> chicken-and-egg problem to un-block the work. > >> > > > > > > Yes - for example this: > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/42654#issuecomment-2387999058 > that > > resulted in some conditional "skip-if" that should not be needed when we > > release final version of the provider - having a .dev* version of > provider > > in PyPI which we could release semi-frequently with new code should solve > > the problem entirely. > > > > > > > >> For edge.. no pressure, some PRs are waiting (still unfortunately). As I > >> am biased for edge, I'd first propose for standard as PR #42676 > >> > > > > Agree. Edge will not be pre-installed and there should be no dependency > on > > it in the airflow CI, or other providers that might cause such failures. > > > > > > >
