+1 - binding - checked reproducibility (fab does not pass it), signatures,
checksums, licences, checked all my changes - except fab size and
reproducibility all is good.

On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 8:52 AM Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> wrote:

> common.messaging and fab are excluded from this vote
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 9:22 AM Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 non binding.
> >
> > Tested my changes which primarily lied in these buckets:
> >
> > CI / static check fixes:
> > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48671
> > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48666
> > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48808
> >
> > Actual changes
> > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48826
> > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/46231
> > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48683
> >
> > Ran this as well as a couple of test dags and all seem to work as
> expected.
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Amogh Desai
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 7:54 AM Vishnu Chilukoori <
> > vish.chiluko...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 non-binding
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Vishnu. Chilukoori
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 12:02 PM Pankaj Koti
> > > <pankaj.k...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 non-binding
> > > >
> > > > Tested my PR in the Databricks provider, it's included in the RC and
> > the
> > > > changes run as expected. Thanks for the release efforts!
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 9:50 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Good observation Jens Last time (RC) I removed the node_modules
> > > manually
> > > > -
> > > > > had no time to fix it, so I guess we should cancel this one and
> > release
> > > > the
> > > > > next one. I will add a fix shortly.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 5:49 PM Jens Scheffler
> > > <j_scheff...@gmx.de.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Elad,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks for preparing! Hope we make Edge to be published as well
> > soon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For all (including edge even though not published atm) providers
> > > > > > *except* FAB
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package
> > > > build,
> > > > > > Licenses, Signatures
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On FAB I saw a difference, the folder
> > > > > > |src/airflow/providers/fab/www/node_modules was packages into the
> > > > > > release (+21MB) which I assume is a temporary folder as being in
> > > > > > .gitignore. Was not able to re-produce the same binary
> (difference:
> > > the
> > > > > > node_modules only, all other looked good). So until clarified -
> > > assume
> > > > > > this needs to be cleaned, I'd -1 for FAB. I assume this is due to
> > > first
> > > > > > "real" release with the changed structures.|
> > > > > >
> > > > > > |Jens
> > > > > > |
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 06.04.25 11:02, Elad Kalif wrote:
> > > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This
> > email
> > > > is
> > > > > > > calling a vote on the release,
> > > > > > > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on
> > > April
> > > > > 09,
> > > > > > > 2025 09:00 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been
> > received.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Provider edge was not cut due tohttps://
> > > > > > github.com/pypi/support/issues/5829
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > > > > > >   Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for
> > the
> > > > > > Provider
> > > > > > > distributions.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > > > > > >   Python "wheel" release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test
> > this
> > > > RC
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > described in:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Public keys are available at:
> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the
> > > community
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > > > > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept
> > here:
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/48842
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > RC
> > > > > > > candidates.
> > > > > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > > > > > documentation
> > > > > > > after the
> > > > > > > RC candidates are released.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-alibaba/3.0.2rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.5.0rc3/
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive/9.0.5rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-livy/4.3.0rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.10.5rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/10.4.1rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.0rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.25.0rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/7.3.0rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/4.3.2rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-exasol/4.7.4rc1/
> > > > > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/2.0.0rc3/
> > > > > > >
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/15.0.0rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/12.3.0rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-mssql/4.2.2rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openlineage/2.1.2rc2/
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-papermill/3.10.0rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/6.1.2rc1/
> > > > > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-sftp/5.1.2rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.2.0rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/0.3.0rc2/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > Elad Kalif
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to