+1 to what Ash, Jarek, and Kaxil said above.

Let's chat in late May or June on this topic.

On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 7:05 AM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yeah, no strength or bandwidth right now for a discussion. And would very
> much prefer we focus on getting 3.0.0 out and any bug fixes after that
>
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 14:08, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
> > Very much agree with Ash here.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 10:30 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Howard,
> > >
> > > Your timing is…. Interesting given we are focusing on getting 3.0
> shipped
> > > and are in the final throws of that.
> > >
> > > Let's revisit this in May or June once the dust has settled from 3.0,
> any
> > > immediate bug fixes we might need, and give people a little bit of time
> > to
> > > unwind after the crunch.
> > >
> > > -ash
> > >
> > > > On 14 Apr 2025, at 16:22, Howard Yoo <howard...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Airflow community members,
> > > >
> > > > Apache Airflow has been moving steadily from conventional statsd
> based
> > > > telemetry into OpenTelemetry (opentelemetry.io), which has gained
> > > > popularity and support for the last few years. There has been AIP
> > > proposals
> > > > which had a 'phased' approach to incorporate
> > > >
> > > > 1. Metrics
> > > > 2. Traces
> > > > 3. Logs
> > > >
> > > > Based on the current availability and maturity of Otel's support.
> Since
> > > the
> > > > metrics emission based on statsd were the fastest low-hanging fruit
> > that
> > > we
> > > > could implement OTEL metrics support relatively easy, which we did as
> > our
> > > > first try.
> > > >
> > > > Second was the Traces. OTEL support on traces for Python was very
> > mature
> > > > and well established. Even though Airflow did not have any prior
> > > > implementation on emitting Traces, we were able to instrument it and
> > > > produce traces on both Airflow specific processes (jobs) (e.g.
> > > schedulers,
> > > > triggers, executors), as well as task runs.
> > > >
> > > > However, the area for Logs were not done yet, due at that time a
> > > relatively
> > > > early and immature state of logs support in Otel.
> > > >
> > > > Now, it seems like Logging support on Python has become stable and
> > > reliable
> > > > that we can use it to emit log messages in Otel format. So, the
> timing
> > > > seems to be quite perfect for us to start up a discussion on it.
> > > >
> > > > Logging support in Airflow is basically provided via 'provider' model
> > > where
> > > > Airflow itself does not have a specific implementation of how logging
> > is
> > > > done, but requests contributors to provide provider that can plug-in
> > > their
> > > > logging support.
> > > >
> > > > Would we want to move to that direction, of having 'opentelemetry'
> > > provider
> > > > ?
> > > > Or do we want to have logging support as more of a native support
> way?
> > > >
> > > > The reason why I would like to start this discussion thread was to
> gain
> > > > opinions from the community on whether Airflow has the interest to
> > > support
> > > > OTEL logging first, and then any opinions on specifics of what would
> be
> > > the
> > > > best way to support OTEL logging.
> > > >
> > > > Please feel free to reply and add any comments to the thread to voice
> > > your
> > > > opinions. If there isn't any substantial interest in OTEL logging,
> > well,
> > > we
> > > > can live without it.
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to