Agreed, I think this could be in the standard package too.

> On 9 Jun 2025, at 20:58, Bas Harenslak <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> With one remark: this feels so “generic” to me that I don’t see why it 
> necessitates a separate package. Why not include it in the standard provider?
> 
> Bas
> 
>> On 9 Jun 2025, at 19:18, Shubham Raj <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> +1 binding
>> 
>> On Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at 7:17 AM Vishnu Chilukoori <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 non-binding
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Regard,
>>> Vishnu Chilukoori
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 9:20 AM Pavankumar Gopidesu <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1 binding..
>>>> 
>>>> Pavan
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025, 21:08 Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1 (with it being “human-in-the-loop” still.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> -ash
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 5 Jun 2025, at 11:34, Buğra Öztürk <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1 binding, looks exciting
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, 12:29 Tamara Fingerlin,
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> +1 non-binding. Very excited about this!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 11:37 AM 邱冠銘 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> +1 for non-binding. I think HITL makes sense to me since it’s a
>>>> common
>>>>>>>> word used in many place like
>>>>>>>> https://cloud.google.com/discover/human-in-the-loop. But “manual”
>>>>>>>> proposed by Shahar is also a good choice in my opinion.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Guan-Ming
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 2025/06/05 08:10:43 Ephraim Anierobi wrote:
>>>>>>>>> +1 binding
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 at 07:52, Amogh Desai <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Left some comments on the AIP, no major concerns, just some
>>>> thoughts.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I am not a huge fan of using "human" as discussed above, so maybe
>>>>>>>> having a
>>>>>>>>>> set of "interactive" operators makes sense?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Amogh Desai
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 11:48 AM Rahul Vats <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Rahul Vats
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 at 11:26, Phani Kumar <
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> .invalid>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 7:13 AM kalyan reddy <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Aritra Basu <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: 05 June 2025 00:53
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 non binding from me as well
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aritra Basu
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, 12:19 am Ankit Chaurasia, <
>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 non-binding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Ankit Chaurasia*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:51 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 at 23:07, Vincent Beck <
>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding. Looks really good!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025/06/04 16:45:24 "Oliveira, Niko" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall it looks great! I left some comments on the AIP
>>>>>>>>>>> document,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing that would block a +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Niko
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Wei Lee <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 2:51:47 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [EXT] [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the
>>>>>>>>>>> organization.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> sender
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the content is safe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un
>>>>>>>>>>> expéditeur
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> externe. Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune
>>>>>>> pièce
>>>>>>>>>>> jointe
>>>>>>>>>>>> si
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ne pouvez pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si
>>>>>>>> vous
>>>>>>>>>>>> n’êtes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certain que le contenu ne présente aucun risque.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to this AIP, but have concerns on the term “Human”
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “manual”, what Shahar suggested, seems to be a great
>>>>>>>>>>> alternative!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wei
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 4, 2025, at 5:33 PM, Jarek Potiuk <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1. Yeah "Human" is not necessarily best name so we
>>>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the name but overall it's good to go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:31 AM Igor Kholopov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall looks good, would be great to also figure
>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>> early
>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth adding an API/UI for getting the information
>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pending
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approvals that require your attention.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd also be hesitant with "Human" in the name, as it
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approved
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> via
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> API, so people will be using it for automation
>>>>>>> without
>>>>>>>>>>> actual
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humans
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> involved.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 9:47 AM Shahar Epstein <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a very slight reservation from using the
>>>>>>> term
>>>>>>>>>>> "human",
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> imagine that AI agents will be able to use this
>>>>>>>> feature
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "manual" would do better?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any case, not too critical atm - the concept of
>>>>>>>>>> enabling
>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025, 02:39 Vikram Koka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jens and I would like to call a vote on this AIP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-90+Human+in+the+loop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The previous discussion thread was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oxr3rm7mlvyxoyx0qfcbmlwggof1xb5t
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxr3rm7mlvyxoyx0qfcbmlwggof1xb5t
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Based on the prior discussions, we have added more
>>>>>>>>>> details
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document itself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you to everyone who commented on the AIP. We
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> answered
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments to the best of our ability at this time,
>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>> left
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so others can see the discussion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will run for ~5 days and last till next
>>>>>>>> Monday,
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9th
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> June
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025 23:30 UTC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC
>>>>>>>>>> members
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes are considered binding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since Jens and I are co-authoring this, please
>>>>>>>> consider
>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vikram
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vikram Koka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chief Strategy Officer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Email: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.astronomer.io/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to