+1 binding On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 at 12:38, Pavankumar Gopidesu <gopidesupa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 non binding. > > Tested a few examples with ShortCircuitOperator , looks good to me. > > Pavan > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 7:40 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) - checked: > > > > * svn > > * installation > > * reproducibility > > * licences > > * signatures > > * checksums > > > > I installed the standard provider 1.4.1rc2 with Airflow 3.0.3. Ran a few > > Dags which are using standard provider operators - all looks good. > > > > J. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 10:23 PM Jens Scheffler > <j_scheff...@gmx.de.invalid > > > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package > build, > > > Licenses, Signatures > > > > > > Tested the standard provider with Airflow 2.11 and 3.0.3 by running the > > > integration_test Dag via EdgeExecutor, all looks good! > > > > > > On 17.07.25 21:23, Elad Kalif wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email > is > > > > calling a vote on the release, > > > > which will last for *24 hours* - which means that it will end on July > > 18, > > > > 2025 19:20 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. > > > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. > > > > > > > > *This is a shortened vote as it contains an important bugfix.* > > > > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > > > > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary > > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the > > > Provider > > > > distributions. > > > > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary > > > > Python "wheel" release. > > > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > > > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this > RC > > is > > > > described in: > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > > > > > > > > > > > Public keys are available at: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community > > are > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release. > > > > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here: > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/53471 > > > > > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in > the > > RC > > > > candidates. > > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the > > > documentation > > > > after the > > > > RC candidates are released. > > > > > > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links: > > > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/1.4.1rc2/ > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Elad Kalif > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
