+1 binding I don't recall any consensus either. I think we discussed, agreed at some level but no vote occured afterwards. Thanks Constance!
Bugra Ozturk On Wed, 15 Oct 2025, 10:55 Wei Lee, <[email protected]> wrote: > Other than not using DAG, I don’t recall a consensus either > > > but we are trying to call a vote to standardise on usage of "Dag" in > docs? Does that mean we cannot use "dag”? > > I think that what we should do is if that’s the result. > > > Best, > Wei > > > On Oct 15, 2025, at 2:14 PM, Amogh Desai <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I do not recall a formal consensus either. > > > > Correct me if I am wrong, but we are trying to call a vote to > standardise on > > usage of "Dag" in docs? Does that mean we cannot use "dag"? > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Amogh Desai > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 4:57 AM Daniel Standish via dev < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I don’t recall there really being consensus on this. > >> > >> I would still like to be able to use simply “dag” in a sentence. > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 12:13 PM Constance Martineau via dev < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi everyone, > >>> > >>> Just to wrap up the dag vs DAG vs Dag nomenclature discussions we've > been > >>> having over the last few months, I would like to formally call a vote > to > >>> standardize on "Dag". > >>> > >>> Jens already updated the docs for 3.1 via this PR > >>> <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/55097>, so hopefully this is > >> just > >>> a > >>> formality. > >>> > >>> Discussion threads: > >>> > >>> - https://lists.apache.org/thread/lktrzqkzrpvc1cyctxz7zxfmc0fwtq2j > >>> - https://lists.apache.org/thread/5fn1n188f99jspt627qhqsp2pznq545s > >>> > >>> > >>> Thank you to everyone who took part in the conversations. The vote will > >> run > >>> for ~3 days, and last till Friday October 17, 2025 at 7:30pm (countdown > >>> link > >>> <https://countingdownto.com/?c=6644364>). > >>> > >>> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and > Committer's > >>> votes are considered binding. > >>> > >>> Please consider this my +1 (non-binding). > >>> -- > >>> > >>> Constance > >>> > >> > >
