The DAG terminology vote I think has surfaced a problem with our multiple
choice voting procedure.

If you allow people to vote for multiple options, they seem to tend to use
it in a manner to signify their ranked preference.  However, this could
easily result in an option that doesn't have majority preference getting
the win.

E.g. suppose 4 people vote for option A, and 5 people vote for option B +1
but also +0.5 for A.  Then option A will win even though people prefer
option B 5 to 4.

This is a bad outcome.

It gets even stranger if you allow negative votes.  Then you end
essentially invalidating other peoples votes, unless *everyone* minuses all
of the options they don't favor.  And even if everyone does that, then it's
hard to see how that gets to the outcome favored by most.

With ranked choice voting, everyone votes for their most favored choice,
but they can also rank all the options.  If their most favored option does
not win, then their vote goes to their second favored option, and so on.

This is a better way to do this.

I propose that when doing multiple choice votes, we do ranked choice,
instead of allowing people to just vote for multiple options with plus or
minus votes.

Reply via email to