+1 binding, implementing Jarek's proposal would be beneficial.

Shahar

On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 9:17 PM Buğra Öztürk <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> I would like to call a vote on this AIP
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=382175838
>
> The previous discussion thread was
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rgbbl8dt79nt455mh62m34dcj2b9s0lb
>
> Based on the discussion on AIP-81
> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-81+Enhanced+Security+in+CLI+via+Integration+of+API
> >,
> this has already been agreed upon as a plan.
> We have a more concrete plan to reduce the impact on users as much as
> possible on AIP-94.
> It is not a child AIP. It contains two different projects, which include a
> tooling and a plan for migration from Airflow CLI (Remote Commands, see
> AIPs) to Airflow CTL (airflowctl).
>
> Thank you to everyone who commented on the AIP and responded to the
> discussion thread!
>
> The vote will run for 5 days and last till next Sunday, the 1st of February
> 2026 21:00 CET.
>
> https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/election?iso=20260201T21&p0=16&msg=%5BVOTE%5D+AIP-94&font=cursive
>
> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members' and Committers'
> votes are considered binding.
>
> Please vote accordingly
>
> [ ] +1 Approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Please consider this is my +1 binding :)
>
> Regards,
> Bugra Ozturk
>

Reply via email to