For apache-airflow, +1 (binding) I have checked, - SVN - Reproducible package builds - Licence - Signature - Checksums
I have checked with diffoscope and see only that the `generated/` part was different. It is indeed coming from old local builds, where, in release checks, we are not mentioning the cleaning generated. We have only part related to cleaning the `dist/` directory. For providers/fab, I have checked, - SVN - Reproducible package builds - Licence - Signature - Checksums Other than the Licence check, it looks good. To double-check, I used both apache-rat-0.17 and apache-rat-0.13, as stated in the version docs and the latest. Both showed the files as unapproved. Please let me know if I missed anything. ``` apache-rat-0.13 Files with unapproved licenses: ./apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4-py3-none-any.whl.asc ./apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4-py3-none-any.whl.sha512 ./apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4.tar.gz.asc ./apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4.tar.gz.sha512 ``` ``` apache-rat-0.17 ***************************************************** Files with unapproved licenses ***************************************************** /apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4-py3-none-any.whl.asc /apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4-py3-none-any.whl.sha512 /apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4.tar.gz.asc /apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4.tar.gz.sha512 ``` Best regards, On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 2:23 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > No big deal if missing and we can explain the difference being that one > file. > > I think it could be an artefact of switching branches. This file is > generated in Airflow 3 and used to check if the file changed - in Airflow > 2's breeze it was not generated at all - because provider_dependencies.json > was committed to git repo. So likely what happened when you > switched branches this file was "left-over". > > One way to check it is to run in a newly checked out repo (or worktree). > > J. > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 1:38 PM Shahar Epstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > When running the reproducible package check I got that the file > > generated/provider_dependencies.json.sha256sum exists in > > dist/apache_airflow-2.11.1.tar.gz but is missing its equivalent asf-dist. > > Did I do something wrong or is it an actual issue? > > > > > > Shahar > > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 2:43 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hey fellow Airflowers, > > > > > > I have cut Airflow 2.11.1rc2 together with accompanying FAB 1.5.4rc1. > > > > > > Notes:: > > > * Airflow 2.11.1 only supports Python 3.10, 3.11, 3.12 - Python 3.9 > > support > > > is dropped (reasons > > > explained in release notes) > > > * we have rc2 not rc1 for Airflow as there were fab dependency issues > > with > > > rc1 already in PyPI, so I had to go with rc2 > > > * I have accidentally published 2.11.1 in PyPI (for now I yanked it) > due > > to > > > technical glitch during preparation (not enough memory for Docker for > > yarn > > > !!). If rc1 will pass testing, I will just unyank it. In case we will > > have > > > to cancel rc1, we will have to release 2.11.2. > > > * Documentation is not yet published using the new workflow - I need to > > > make some modifications to fix the workflows for v2-11 branch - but I > am > > > close and I should be able to publish the docs tomorrow. > > > > > > This email is calling a vote on both - airflow and fab provider. > > > > > > The vote will last at least 72 hours, from Tuesday, February 17, 2026 > > 0:00 > > > UTC > > > until Friday, February 17, 2026 0:00 UTC, and until 3 binding +1 votes > > have > > > been received. > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=8&iso=20260217T0-00&p1=1440 > > > > > > Status of testing of the release is kept in > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/62056 > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. > > > > > > Airflow 2.11.1rc2 is available at: > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/2.11.1rc2/ > > > > > > *apache-airflow-2.11.1-source.tar.gz* is a source release that comes > with > > > INSTALL instructions - the source file covers both Airflow and Fab. > > > *apache-airflow-2.11.1.tar.gz* is the binary Python "sdist" release. > > > *apache_airflow-2.11.1-py3-none-any.whl* is the binary Python wheel > > > "binary" release. > > > > > > Docker images are available at: > > > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/airflow/tags?name=2.11.1rc2 > > > > > > Fab provider 1.5.4rc2 is available in: > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/2.11/2026-02-16/ > > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4.tar.gz* is the binary Python > "sdist" > > > release. > > > *apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4-py3-none-any.whl* is the binary > > Python > > > wheel "binary" release > > > > > > > > > Public keys are available at: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the > community > > > are encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > > > > > Airflow: > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/v2-11-stable/dev/README_RELEASE_AIRFLOW.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > > > > > The test procedure for contributors and members of the community who > > would > > > like to test this RC is described in: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/v2-11-stable/dev/README_RELEASE_AIRFLOW.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > > > > > Note that the way to install airflow with `pip` or `uv` (for Python > 3.10) > > > > > > [uv] pip install apache-airflow==2.11.1rc2 --constraint > > > > > > > > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/airflow/constraints-2.11.1rc2/constraints-3.10.txt > > > > > > This should install both: apache-airflow==2.11.1rc2 and > > > apache-airflow-providers-fab==1.5.4rc1 > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the `rcX` string, so it's > > now > > > simply 2.11.1. This will allow us to rename the artifact without > > modifying > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release. > > > > > > Release Notes: > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/2.11.1rc2/RELEASE_NOTES.rst > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > J. > > > > > > -- Bugra Ozturk
